Re: leader statements
Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Wed, 09 October 2013 23:55 UTC
Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9B821E822B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id etInQFDzmiMY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x234.google.com (mail-ea0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E421E8218 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f180.google.com with SMTP id h10so763758eaj.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KA8YYAvLF+WKZSaGwU3rZJLMIpv/E+gdgsPN5Js+rxU=; b=YEUr+AAEjIWiP/3bp0oRVFdKART/BGdHb9N0e7TrdkZ8lfHULbCb3GZWtpr9N33o16 O3DuhiKdw/QA033Nf/UaIEgYqbFxeqGT97CqEHd+QT1XWoWza/6wfQ23iXxwRzfmz6xO 1GTztVZrHJgNxiE4yk6MOzjYCHo1ADkw6Lg4KDOGK8nig87yCIa7cQDHa7IMB4GoxGVo b1jIY5zk1KKsyn1hLy/Ww8yP5POjvDYKwq4XCgl/9V1MVt/ErzMqSaAiYtH2d9k7K/Ym XpRH3+gNexP2odiTZpeyo38EPg9TO/KYvjZAYdlmgcqjIZ25MF/1V5H9g42zrZ/5gCXE /auQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.15.33.132 with SMTP id c4mr15706055eev.2.1381362924382; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.205.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.205.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5255DBE3.3040503@gmail.com>
References: <ABCF1EB7-3437-4EC3-B0A8-0EDB2EDEA538@ietf.org> <20131007225129.GA572@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20131008213432.0c1e4b30@resistor.net> <20131009064438.GA47673@mx1.yitter.info> <E003D3DC4E4B3208CF14E8E0@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20131009192715.GG49231@mx1.yitter.info> <5255B647.4090103@gmail.com> <nkfb59p3oujs3n14sled2esahfsu76282c@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <5255DBE3.3040503@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:55:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP-4vp1=6M7Qb_5pu9rBM0fJ14ORaKWxeF_j1SxXkiozGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: leader statements
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0163457269ee5d04e8579ee9"
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:55:26 -0000
Discursive debate in advance is for establishing principles, and establishing the level of trust invested in someone. Then you let them go to do the job you chose them for. If an issue is of such weight that it requires a lot of discussion, and you chose the right people, they will know that already. On Oct 9, 2013 3:43 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > Björn, > > On 10/10/2013 10:21, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > * Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Either we trust our current and future chairs, on certain occasions, > >> to speak in our name without there being a discursive debate in advance, > >> or we will have no voice on those occasions. > > > > We should think before we speak, and discursive debate is our collective > > thought process. Accordingly I would expect Chairs to anticipate and fa- > > cilitate debates that might be necessary or useful, especially on issues > > where they find giving the collective a voice may be important. It seems > > implausible to me that there would be notably many such occasions. Maybe > > because as German I am inclined towards disregarding phatic expressions. > > I assure you that after looking up "phatic" I feel the same way. > And I agree with your point: when there's time to consult the community, > of course it should be done. But sometimes there isn't time, which > is when IMHO we should show some trust in our various Chairs. > > Brian > >
- Re: Montevideo statement Noel Chiappa
- Montevideo statement IETF Chair
- Re: Montevideo statement Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Montevideo statement Jari Arkko
- Re: Montevideo statement Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Montevideo statement Martin Millnert
- Re: Montevideo statement Tobias Gondrom
- Re: Montevideo statement manning bill
- Re: Montevideo statement Michael Richardson
- Re: Montevideo statement Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Montevideo statement Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Montevideo statement manning bill
- Re: Montevideo statement SM
- Re: Montevideo statement Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Montevideo statement joel jaeggli
- Re: Montevideo statement Ted Lemon
- Re: Montevideo statement John C Klensin
- Re: Montevideo statement Tobias Gondrom
- Re: Montevideo statement Russ Housley
- Re: Montevideo statement joel jaeggli
- leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Montevideo statement Arturo Servin
- Re: Montevideo statement SM
- Re: Montevideo statement Russ Housley
- Re: leader statements Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Montevideo statement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: leader statements Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: leader statements Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: leader statements Brian E Carpenter
- "The core Internet institutions abandon the US Go… Carsten Bormann
- Re: leader statements Scott Brim
- Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) SM
- Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) Jari Arkko
- Re: Montevideo statement Medel v6 Ramirez
- Re: Montevideo statement Dave Crocker
- Re: leader statements manning bill
- Re: leader statements Arturo Servin
- Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) manning bill
- Re: leader statements Melinda Shore
- Re: Montevideo statement Jari Arkko
- Re: Montevideo statement Ted Lemon
- Re: leader statements Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: Montevideo statement Dave Crocker
- Re: Montevideo statement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Montevideo statement SM
- Re: Montevideo statement Jari Arkko
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… Jorge Amodio
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… John Levine
- Re: leader statements Suzanne Woolf
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… Jorge Amodio
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… Dave Crocker
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Montevideo statement Michael Richardson
- Re: Montevideo statement Jari Arkko
- Re: Montevideo statement John C Klensin
- Re: Montevideo statement Randy Bush
- Re: [IETF] Re: Montevideo statement Warren Kumari
- Re: Montevideo statement Jorge Amodio
- Re: [IETF] Re: Montevideo statement shogunx