Evolution in action (Re: Thinking differently)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 02 April 2003 06:36 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA01358; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 01:36:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 190bxE-0001F7-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 01:42:36 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 190bwO-0001D2-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 01:41:44 -0500
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA01170 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 01:24:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no [192.168.1.4]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCAF6223F; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:27:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:27:19 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@sidn.nl>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Evolution in action (Re: Thinking differently)
Message-ID: <179730000.1049264839@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <E190SPS-000AsD-00@roam.psg.com>
References: <200304011927.h31JRYQ07127@boreas.isi.edu> <200304011952.h31JqKZ8011965@bartok.sidn.nl> <E190SPS-000AsD-00@roam.psg.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--On tirsdag, april 01, 2003 12:31:06 -0800 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> 
wrote:

>> During this discussion I've seen references to the "69/8 debacle".
>> Can anybody explain what the debacle is/was? Is this a magic phrase
>> for real insiders? Is is something that happened only on a local
>> net? If not, why don't you explain to the rest of the world? What
>> IS the argument hinted to with mentioning the "69/8 debacle".
>
> idiot isps who configured route filters but did not bother to maintain
> them.  darwin at work.  the subject is uninteresting, as the study
> of stupidity is an exceedingly target-rich environment.

for those of us who are endlessly fascinated by watching evolution in 
action - what was the previous usage of 69/8 that led to those filters 
being installed?

(parenthesis: similar things have reportedly happened to people using .info 
for email - there turns out to be a number of MTAs in the world who have 
hardcoded all the non-2-letter TLDs, assuming "there will be no more", and 
routinely toss mail from/to the newer ones. They, too, deserve the pain 
they get; unfortunately they, like the route filterers, don't get all the 
pain they cause.)

                  Harald