NomCom procedures revision

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 25 August 2015 04:01 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374C41AD0B9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLvt8VcaDhwl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D3FD1AD0B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by widdq5 with SMTP id dq5so2537292wid.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dUSN54gXqcEsDr5UsS817xFzfJSSY9nsynizJLPHKlg=; b=T7ScpyXMH8pqb/qmDbRrda3lifzqdU5VBJ14y606g7Obf8oD5WvLcV2YQEf7YhKEAK nHCb2RkbfpQl3Wli/kmej4AK1mhYSAYqFbv+jfevgPBpD2AHHU8VMomy9OoqAal4dfRu RWG1wMoDqpGxY/zz0m6aQafEdiq19Trp2u2TYWedFZbeJO9a1Vx7BPf2spJDbM1cHk0i DRVhe8zTbhtC7NIUkvYfrnhciQFRs6vQG6qZjQ4ol7a+/5L8Ur4eAOItJvYLNFUfWWqF gjxK/MQpqdtjk5R0i82jpNrXUhiHFzKfl2wdDWIGLm4Tjz7JywA+Vc4UkBPS9Q1I9LZX Fong==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.107.1 with SMTP id gy1mr1121866wib.16.1440475268880; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.194.10 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:01:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYJzFZT=OgWqiiTw-n6mvb3PPusRtArmPs_d4_qpLfmpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: NomCom procedures revision
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2352abb59dd2051e1ac899
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QHwG1KrQDBK9u0wsfALjPSre-pw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 04:01:12 -0000

Some months ago I started the work of editing a revision to the NomCom
procedures (RFC7437bis).  We made progress on some points, but seem to have
stalled on revising the requirements for qualifying to serve on NomCom.

The draft I have recently expired.  Is there any interest in taking another
run at this now?  Alternatively, is it worth publishing what we did
accomplish, and leaving that one point for a later attempt?

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc7437bis/

-MSK