IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 27 March 2017 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45291296B1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ATy23KMLvMKb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFFF01296A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2RMmBqh014689; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:48:11 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-8535.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.133.53]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2RMm9HY014671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:48:10 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Barry Leiba' <barryleiba@computer.org>, 'IETF discussion list' <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <149064625785.30521.6221370793035045425.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVCh=X7M6GzicYtp7cr3FTjzY-=Fczp1eSf5uetQY6zYHw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCh=X7M6GzicYtp7cr3FTjzY-=Fczp1eSf5uetQY6zYHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:48:09 +0100
Message-ID: <002a01d2a74c$3624f330$a26ed990$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQG4AZj8JFA8DvNOcql1Tf+uKxwIcgEoEo8ModVTb8A=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.1.0.1062-22970.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--13.056-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--13.056-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HXSqh3WYKftlx7C8em/tVu0/o+/4D7DzXZfXqSXUXvkQI6JYceCSYGCA /WPi4f08CiU/ecaS1Y1W3VcAc19KwQmWooBi7asXGrp19tJczoWdtHUoZpvlecWkDW4kV3WaIRx QCWPfi6l8beWYRZDCBtGd1EGjtJPEcqDNL2RTzARb/n0V6kg0kRLXa2P1m93z4VxV5lFS0Fk5d9 n04fLNZk2pWHi7CF1CRpvSv/4NlMkRTDsU3WmrQriMC5wdwKqdfS0Ip2eEHnxlgn288nW9IN5/H gWYxplM5MIx11wv+CM7AFczfjr/7NNZrheW7/xSg+TCLVR0mfy1cRW8EC796KjHKZ5NBOEJh+EJ IQHqC8g=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QJQ59lP_Sv3GgfxKRrErT-HeENk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:48:19 -0000

Echo what Barry said.
IMHO, giving feedback was a very brave thing to do. 
Previous NomComs have shied away from this for fear of confidentiality and the additional thought and hard work needed to keep community feedback anonymous. 
Also NomComs have been worried about opening discussions about their decisions.
I think this year's NomCom handled this very well, and I hope they leave a sound trail of breadcrumbs for future NomComs to follow.

Adrian

> >   -- Feedback provided to nominees who accepted a nomination on request.
> 
> I've thanked the NomCom for this last item, and I want to repeat that
> thanks publicly: I'm *so* glad that this NomCom has agreed to provide
> feedback, I've found their feedback to be excellent and valuable to
> me, and I very much hope that future NomComs continue this new
> practice.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email