Re: [ietf-smtp] IETF Policy on dogfood consumption or avoidance - SMTP version

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 18 December 2019 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050EB12089B; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:47:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZg2bALUig34; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E351201A3; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xBIFjRdv006185; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:47:21 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=EMml/17QGlxRSc1rFIKqXbab8Ib53+tYYR2zeGm28AU=; b=KRbl384EwHwRAxeQb3rDqaPNuIzOOA7LTv9mDpadPGTL2/cJn0npBfpTaZlvzw9QrxN0 6D4XqJIQfHDxWZx2yweQWuY9dn+QRVaXH87BVb9Fp3ZZp2Fut4Z2yVfoh1c2ZyIqwrbw xNazzFXXbCB8po3c9dsFizBU1XSPk6EdvKoFRDgB4RYev2tD2nb+pqfF0ej2KjG6LD3R nkUyzUWjSYcNJ7EP905B2ZDjqG9aqsXnonS6BNgtCsaA2A+dHzcbmL9aK/fMh+VB9xWp +Jxo5/fNv+i5nSr9WljrWOoFcvpHFtT85OacO5GVHQMD+lmtsn2DRmPXkDlB63dDcliU zQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2wvqvusnbe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:47:20 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBIFWJUR032036; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:47:19 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2wvuy1wvg2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:47:13 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:46:54 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:46:54 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "hsantos@isdg.net" <hsantos@isdg.net>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC: "ietf-smtp@ietf.org" <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] IETF Policy on dogfood consumption or avoidance - SMTP version
Thread-Topic: [ietf-smtp] IETF Policy on dogfood consumption or avoidance - SMTP version
Thread-Index: AQHVtS5tYCvHSVMCKUaIQ+AMnLOYfae/DTGAgACLUACAAAbTgIAAaw0A
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:46:53 +0000
Message-ID: <098FB429-5FC6-45EA-954C-DE232E5EEA16@akamai.com>
References: <8EE11B75E1F8A7E7105A1573@PSB> <m2a77ttff6.wl-randy@psg.com> <CABL0ig4Wz-0dk7bsRpaN6pni2rHEc-jPnygwed_Hygy+CiehQA@mail.gmail.com> <16306b3a-63bd-621e-636c-dd7626f74733@foobar.org> <DBADBA1F-5F81-4D14-8AF8-5F340F017DAC@ietf.org> <5DF92645.2090909@isdg.net> <E314E2AC-C69C-4828-AD5F-33C0EFD4E0FE@dukhovni.org> <5DF95EF7.4050200@isdg.net> <09AD6F9E-311A-4000-B830-43AA92C78C46@akamai.com> <m21rt2qo6f.wl-randy@psg.com> <5DF9A9D1.40106@isdg.net>
In-Reply-To: <5DF9A9D1.40106@isdg.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.20.0.191208
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.117.187]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6DD18CB7A43FB84795B0628A14F8290E@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-12-18_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=931 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912180127
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-18_04:2019-12-17,2019-12-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=889 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912180129
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QKyZq-nBo-LbK7dEBQPaBvmQwCw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:47:24 -0000

I overstated, sorry.

On 12/17/19, 11:23 PM, "Hector Santos" <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote:

    On 12/17/2019 10:59 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
    >>> A "MUST NOT" protocol element MAY be overridden with "550" Policies.
    >> I think it's always clear that local policy can override.
    >
    > that's a SHOULD NOT
    
    +1, exactly.
    
    
    -- 
    HLS