IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 28 November 2013 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F79B1AE218; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:51:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uPqXofMqEPfY; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com (exprod7og116.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D04D1AE215; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUpesz4tPNxUT20MFRm3L38wktIkafW3+@postini.com; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:51:28 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9201B82E8; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6776190043; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vpna-132.vpn.nominum.com (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:51:26 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Subject: Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5006.1385666853@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:51:22 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <D4D5920A-E041-42E8-BB1C-1CB24FBEE3F4@nominum.com>
References: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl> <52974AA8.6080702@cisco.com> <1F79045E-8CD0-4C5D-9090-3E82853E62E9@nominum.com> <52976F56.4020706@dcrocker.net> <3CD78695-47AD-4CDF-B486-3949FFDC107B@nominum.com> <5006.1385666853@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?Herv=E9?= <h_o_w_@hotmail.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>, rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:51:30 -0000

On Nov 28, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> That tells me that the participants are not willing to live with losing and
> move on, and so no voting process will work either.

Right, that's the concern.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email