IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality

Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com> Tue, 13 April 2021 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <petite.abeille@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BB73A1140 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ceFXdmeWcF4m for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CCD63A1147 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id b136-20020a1c1b8e0000b029012c69da2040so814899wmb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=AIFx9W8vmyexbRRr9lyrNlyw70+IMRRVm7cDHHYl3Ok=; b=KRcoTJvz1Qaqd+a9OidYdKdcYpQO8pclfZBwGnHOic2pvzaeQzYUS/2sfIl3fCCyGJ 27SppLNPTa2bV/Hr+b+jDUsp99icrHzeGjvJIIxv7hm1K+09Hka77y66gzq8B9xaJxi3 XcErdY6e3BYm8PBqQN7zP08E1uKH62QC9B1sIOZo8jbPJEfla5z7P5JI31nciIPObKFV LWwkinb+g3YOWg4P5UFqUR3Nec/5Wx1LE0M8gJKCYzJqJHol0w8FjSpS9yrzPrKgYuBZ nHIy3YYxLCaCDr/FJo2UkHoPyiPH+Xm3OwnUClGLJPbI2BG+jeIHhXbMk1/khmKQb7WH mEnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=AIFx9W8vmyexbRRr9lyrNlyw70+IMRRVm7cDHHYl3Ok=; b=sAn7BIFBSg9yBcl1rJLKeFRELIAobi2Dot3sw+crWUjpCyPnr81/11UoYgxejCf2Ji UrJ5ehbXXm65ynOBxYspE9XY7jNYpFvRHsNLxT+zhI6RrSSQd5UqqRZU7Gf9HxbEiFMQ 1YsZoSV+YlMen6cR3QEm/yrbq+lj8nf/sfzRPGwiXOATybY2za/h9lo6chjTA+oxUqDC v1tEW8SlpVNXwXvO4VOdgoSdnxCWWqfeuUMzt3Kmowo69zHK5DHDM2QCEpJcpStTreLt VywDqWrsMHbJNs9rOQUBoMenSGe6lwvDJ2gPR/WfsftosU2pOieOrDuYHNIGxTZI2lAu soIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530A2KsPXFoT0w0T9wVLxTUrDUNk5fvYvIl4n81n0eYJbsuH/JMB KBT6aG63znXPz12S2ZZkgj+QZ7X/Vr8zU4Al
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9jeIzMdS5UDgPMaYFRB9xTfswBpi9vCwX0I6J76uXUgXMdRBRkJg+xHi0mmqhzfWO90JxCA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e3c3:: with SMTP id a186mr2668548wmh.81.1618299834277; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([213.55.241.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a3sm20345270wru.40.2021.04.13.00.43.53 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Subject: Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:43:53 +0200
References: <YHOAzeOj1JaGdmsO@straasha.imrryr.org> <5e91c054-5935-df07-e8ba-09cc78f6c950@network-heretics.com> <YHPSP8Kij2K4v7qQ@straasha.imrryr.org> <82c5fcc6-b419-6efb-b682-b5dbb32905e2@network-heretics.com> <585D8590-472B-4CBC-8292-5BE85521DD76@gmail.com> <a6545baf-b15e-3690-d7b5-be33c4078e02@mtcc.com> <20210412221435.GV9612@localhost> <0755b70e-cc8e-3404-73cd-51950b3d7e53@mtcc.com> <20210412222748.GW9612@localhost> <b0a43f25-c4c2-9f3c-1a42-426a6ef6afa0@mtcc.com> <20210412231850.GA9612@localhost> <9e52dc5b-6dbc-5a98-3205-84cf18da012e@mtcc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <9e52dc5b-6dbc-5a98-3205-84cf18da012e@mtcc.com>
Message-Id: <FAFE13D1-C1C7-4D25-A559-E6BD47194E9D@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QTYNvtcgQFQbxHBLlhiPTc1V6Zw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:44:04 -0000


> On Apr 13, 2021, at 01:21, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
> 
> Maybe somebody should take score of the new RR's vs. deployment. Data is our friend.

Sure — data could be our friend. But data on its own doesn't make decisions. We do. By our actions. Or lack thereof.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email