IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Bounty: Consultation on DRAFT Infrastructure and Services Vulnerability Disclosure Statement

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 06 August 2020 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC3C3A0E7B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vy6q-MlpbZdn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BF3D3A0E7E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 076JincP008551; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 20:46:15 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=aoNG+GEIEn2PMcf4shzkhQx6LIySDVJUGPQ0bDzHGpE=; b=lIKFNcLsnd3k8L39DOz+Ji+Dh6I6GEPT1i60tFzo6pkBaVQN6z66+Cc9SNIBq4NTstmM otFpVR/GnsPjajm4Dwd8FxlptFDLOCsd153FMD673SFFZNxZN5Py+FGqa5UtZRRbWmUU h6/yM/ypPKFWuOgFFUJa2sKzNKtSYl/xae2GosMqalqMVh8xXBlbIyKlFZSlgFkfsJ7i EBZM/b43qGi+2fouun5HFjFkA6HbLmOAdBa2t35cAGP/S3T7t9x4S8/Q9O1ii2bv5Ml+ IWQwsY1eiz7RgfXIy6e7OqmXF6jtBMGfj3G5GxgcgUP+gJJRJyYtBKlYAgewwcwjz4UM 8A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a72-247-45-32.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.32] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 32n8df356p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 20:46:14 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 076JaXPE026435; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:46:14 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.118]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 32n3qysw34-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:46:14 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:46:13 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:46:13 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
CC: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Bounty: Consultation on DRAFT Infrastructure and Services Vulnerability Disclosure Statement
Thread-Topic: Bounty: Consultation on DRAFT Infrastructure and Services Vulnerability Disclosure Statement
Thread-Index: AQHWbAJjNrTOc3S+5k6Up6Y2g3tuBakrQyOAgACDwAD//8ZVAA==
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 19:46:12 +0000
Message-ID: <27836ABC-3E3D-40AD-AD95-41AF40C3AB84@akamai.com>
References: <B8EC2B88-81B7-47F4-A9DF-34A49077857E@cable.comcast.com> <C20C9BA2-549D-4326-B77E-D8E6A2DE7511@akamai.com> <CAChr6SzXswgpjUJUWN=xhB2QiBn7FYEUJYos1+5WTjS_3oantg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SzXswgpjUJUWN=xhB2QiBn7FYEUJYos1+5WTjS_3oantg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.39.20071300
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.44.224]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_27836ABC3E3D40ADAD9541AF40C3AB84akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-06_15:2020-08-06, 2020-08-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=874 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008060125
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-06_15:2020-08-06, 2020-08-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=845 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008060127
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Q__twphx5dLIsxlk2Qmt5fPb8nw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 19:46:26 -0000

  *   It really depends on how complicated the website is. Lots of web software companies have bounty programs: <https://hackerone.com/bug-bounty-programs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hackerone.com_bug-2Dbounty-2Dprograms&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=9yopDRX42PExPbYF-eggvlq4FExMfOLqx8W5jhXhGco&s=UjUf-cfSf4dYMzBfB4ZCyDTIC51syIcsOO2WkqSbicE&e=>>

I stand by my opinion. I also don’t recommend H1 since you mentioned them.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email