Re: Useful summary for IESG [was ietf@ietf.org]

Stephane,

On 2008-04-22 03:04, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:41:33PM +0300,
>  Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote 
>  a message of 46 lines which said:
> 
>> Rather than providing these types of summaries it would make more
>> sense to provide a conclusion of the individual discussions. This,
>> btw, often does not happen in working groups either. As a consequent
>> nobody knows (after a long discussion) whether there was a
>> conclusion or what the conclusion could have been.
> 
> Before trying to summarize the (very open) discussions on the IETF
> general mailing list, a good start would be to summarize IESG
> evaluations... I would be interested to know, for instance, why
> draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch or draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation
> were not approved by IESG (there is certainly a good reason, but to
> extract it from datatracker is not obvious).

https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation/comment/62414/
seems pretty clear to me; you might disagree, but that's another matter.

However, what you say is why the IESG started its narrative
minutes at http://www.ietf.org/IESG/iesg-narrative.shtml
but they depend on volunteer effort. I find them useful.

    Brian

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf