Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Tue, 31 January 2017 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D81B128B37 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:59:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a9RPNSEBrx6q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:59:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx142.netapp.com (mx142.netapp.com [216.240.21.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB22E1299A3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:59:07 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,315,1477983600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="168435685"
Received: from vmwexchts01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.12]) by mx142-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2017 07:51:30 -0800
Received: from VMWEXCCAS05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.21) by VMWEXCHTS01-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:58:03 -0800
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:58:03 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=+OrSzIJ2WZZcl2KP9AqYszht0H6FZs9SSVmy3vJv6lU=; b=JlwJGknzWUe3vBkgVegEJDE2Mwfom/8xTfAmiJmP5nyO9+rPQQwmRt71CO4fuC1CFbusKFmLb3wpD8mtgu4TRNbNeBz+6rTI/kpwBBbx9OfWP2VdHlyPrfyxPF4CRtIwF2vestq3r423199aZmdiGgpGtPvxaNXWEEfYNWRF+OM=
Received: from BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.157.18) by BN3PR0601MB1154.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.157.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.12; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:58:01 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.157.18]) by BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.157.18]) with mapi id 15.01.0874.020; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:58:02 +0000
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Topic: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Index: AQHRttH12bhBmE92iEqMXe40vpIpaZ/L21cAgAAFxYCAAAsWAIAAGKcAgABbZACAAENBgIAAPmgAgABev4CAAIkOgIGDjrqAgAGgLACAANaFgIAAdgwAgAACyIA=
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:58:01 +0000
Message-ID: <3CD5E2D3-4712-44DC-8DE1-BB9F255EF551@netapp.com>
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org> <1C8639E6-1058-4D04-84ED-0C354E6567D1@cisco.com> <9CBABA69-1814-4676-9C69-E129F04AD24C@cisco.com> <5DFDEA43-8156-491D-A300-2BCED1AED1A4@gmail.com> <5747909C.20403@si6networks.com> <955df2106aa2e12cefbd450be022e779.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <D36D49EE.35116%jefft0@remap.ucla.edu> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266663BF@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <CA+ruDECdMAC2PQqibqQijc-nLHUxOGw0h-ZYyh8FnZZaeZ8sTA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+ruDEBHyzk5cg5Vmq-anKJTxLkZpHrb9APwkfbDGn6FeFzR_w@mail.gmail.com> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B052BD4B85D@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <6BC98448-93D1-4584-90FB-8E2DC03A41B5@itron.com> <CAC8QAcfZBqPUYf6goNpC9MNTgQ97U_UOZ6DOoOPfugz0ApZbpg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcfZBqPUYf6goNpC9MNTgQ97U_UOZ6DOoOPfugz0ApZbpg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lars@netapp.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [2001:a61:3187:2601:318c:b24:242f:9d92]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3014ecd1-c7f4-4d6d-049c-08d449f1ef89
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1154;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0601MB1154; 7: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0601MB11549FA293713E3070CE31FFA74A0@BN3PR0601MB1154.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(6072148); SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1154; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1154;
x-forefront-prvs: 0204F0BDE2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(6009001)(7916002)(39450400003)(189002)(55674003)(377424004)(24454002)(199003)(93886004)(38730400001)(2906002)(4001150100001)(229853002)(33656002)(36756003)(4326007)(6486002)(77096006)(6506006)(122556002)(3280700002)(7736002)(82746002)(83716003)(99936001)(3660700001)(305945005)(110136003)(6916009)(2950100002)(105586002)(5640700003)(81166006)(1730700003)(106356001)(102836003)(2351001)(99286003)(6306002)(6116002)(86362001)(106116001)(6512007)(5660300001)(76176999)(6436002)(50986999)(25786008)(2501003)(101416001)(57306001)(2900100001)(189998001)(68736007)(81156014)(92566002)(8676002)(53936002)(8936002)(97736004)(50226002)(104396002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1154; H:BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: netapp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8B654313-3113-4E1D-B8D5-6C6D1950F3A1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Jan 2017 15:58:01.9669 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0601MB1154
X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QotSVdEtNMP2OQoCNSGHpEhJOwY>
Cc: "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:59:09 -0000

Hi,

On 2017-1-31, at 16:48, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:
> I remind people that just a few years ago, all the meetings were being
> held in the US.

sorry, but that is just incorrect. Check https://ietf.org/meeting/past.html

IETF18 was in Canada, 27 in The Netherlands, 30 in Toronto, 33 in Stockholm, 39 in Munich -- and that was 20 years ago. We've been rotating ever since.

> US is the home ship for IETF.

This was probably true before the mid-90s. It certainly hasn't been since.

> Yes, I sympatize with those having
> issues in entering and hope that somehow those restrictions will go
> away.

Thank you, we all do. The question is what we do in the meantime.

> Actually I propose meeting more often in the US, that will be good for
> everybody.

Er, come again? How is going more often to a place that makes it harder for people to participate physically "good for everybody?"

Lars