RE: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> Thu, 09 August 2012 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C862721F86F9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OuigqymqKSSo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B2F21F86EB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q79KO94E001212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:24:10 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC047.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.93]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q79KO9hh028680; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:24:09 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.24]) by DEMUEXC047.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:22:59 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:22:57 +0200
Message-ID: <E4873516F3FC7547BCFE792C7D94039C0236B662@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64041CD5E4@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Thread-Index: Ac12VgUMwIXfPfLIQUmsmeJS8rt9KQAFD8zgAACWVbA=
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com><502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net><AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk><EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk><39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com><01af01cd74f5$217e5770$647b0650$@us><5021CDDE.8060207@dcrocker.net><alpine.OSX.2.01.1208071937500.20339@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net><B33DB90A-5819-4CEE-AE99-DAEC5CC5425C@proto6.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64041CD5E4@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
From: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, ext Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com>, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Aug 2012 20:22:59.0064 (UTC) FILETIME=[C49AD780:01CD766C]
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 3535
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1344543850-00003184-F3BB5721/0-0/0-0
Cc: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, ietf@ietf.org, dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:24:21 -0000

Istanbul, Dubai, and similar places will not allow all of us in the
community to participate in the meetings.... 


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:20 PM
To: ext Geoff Mulligan; Ole Jacobsen
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; dcrocker@bbiw.net; Richard Shockey
Subject: RE: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

Why not consider Istanbul? It's another nice harbor city.

Has a series of world class hotels like Grand Hyatt, Hilton,
InterContinental, Radisson Blu but also less expensive hotels, close to
each other.

Cheers, 
Mehmet 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of ext Geoff
> Mulligan
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 8:47 PM
> To: Ole Jacobsen
> Cc: Richard Shockey; dcrocker@bbiw.net; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
> 
> So then why not consider, London, Paris (not the Concorde Lafayette),
Frankfurt,
> Amsterdam?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:55 PM, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > You said about Prague:
> >
> > "...[do] folks who live outside of that region not care about the
> > additional hop of travel to get to it?"
> >
> > This gets cited often, and I don't really understand why. There are
> > VERY few European cities that are reachable directly from the US (or
> > Asia for that matter). Most require transiting some kind of major
hub
> > (London, Paris, Frankfurt, Amsterdam to name a few). There will
always
> > be exceptions, I am sure you can get to Stockholm directly from the
US
> > East Coast, but not from the West Coast. I am sure a very large
> > percentage of the IETF attendees from the US went through London or
> > Frankfurt (or a small number of alternatives) to get to Stockholm on
> > the two occasions when we met there.
> >
> > Since I travel to Norway on a more or less regular basis, I am used
to
> > (and quite happy to) go through Frankfurt or London, it's just a
fact
> > of life especially if you factor in the "preferred carrier"
(personal
> > or corporate). Prague may be an "extra hop," but depending on
> > schedules you might well get to your destination (hotel) just as
> > quickly as you would for getting from CDG to central Paris or LHR to
> > central London.
> >
> > If we restrict European cities to the ones with direct flight
> > connections from other continents, we're really limiting the
choices.
> > Let's be a little more realistic and consider actual travel "pain"
> > from the top hubs in Europe, assuming we can't (always) meet in
those
> > places.
> >
> > I do understand that the extra hop does add some cost, which is why
> > I always consider trains as a reasonable alternative, albeit not a
> > particularly fast one. For example, the cost for a First Class train
> > ticket from Frankfurt to Prague was 98 Euros. I am not suggesting
> > that this is always going to be a reasonable alternative, and I am
> > worried that the mere mention of "train" on this list may result in
> > a flame war, but still...
> >
> > Ole
> >
> >
> >
> > Ole J. Jacobsen
> > Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> > Cisco Systems
> > Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
> > E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> > Skype: organdemo
> >
> >