Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 02 April 2020 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31C53A15B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LfBvG2zvLEmA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bumble.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (bumble.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0724C3A15FD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAC3181609; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:25:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a41.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-10-8.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.10.8]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C3ABA18167F; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:25:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a41.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.6); Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:25:58 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Bottle-White: 6dd0de7733c85c77_1585841158806_4096136459
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1585841158806:2029581124
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1585841158805
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a41.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a41.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EF2803E8; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=UBRVUZDztuScFD dGyf8Y+hNXH8s=; b=AVjnpG/Y4eAmjKUC2hId+8yvqsebJC/gQpcmdTlIfDM2YM DDLxwWkeZ6dR6ml03Q/rpci+IBEuYSf4nSqTiDFEvtprtbuBrduqxYO0WBLMk/bu h/USEd+NhavOBJIrybC+AcdysUPCrrYG7Mgy1amYTi8vK94n6pthZJ4o09B88=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a41.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9339803EC; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:25:53 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a41
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Message-ID: <20200402152552.GX18021@localhost>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <89730DD8-0451-4658-A0CD-83A85E2055FE@episteme.net> <0C31D020-46FA-424E-8FFD-64BBE8F952E9@cooperw.in> <1E702B62-9982-48F2-B8D6-F4F80A8DE168@episteme.net> <20200331184236.GT18021@localhost> <CALaySJ+_+-kf+3nta8LwMiwPmqPmRdOgC7KAnDfeDgx0ThVa-w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+27gcT6x5BcKU1YHHv+xeaXDnxPU0yhtBSULb36VpFWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBy7iVT4NVLw14+=a1ksWrg35q+dsKfs+9r2poiVo3wkg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBy7iVT4NVLw14+=a1ksWrg35q+dsKfs+9r2poiVo3wkg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrtdeggdekfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QyO8NNgMTKzv6vsH_svS948ILOY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:33:06 -0000

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:03:05AM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:
> The IESG has listened to the discussion and has reconsidered.  We have
> posted an Internet draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020/
> 
> Murray will be the shepherding AD, and will request a four-week last
> call later today, to end on 30 April, the deadline we had set for
> comments.  The following week (7 May) will have an IESG telechat, and
> we would expect to have the document on that telechat agenda for
> approval.
> 
> The substantive bit in the document is as I described in the message below.

+1.  Thanks for submitting an I-D.