RE: IPv10.

http://www.etsi.org/technologies-clusters/technologies/next-generation-protocols

I guess a rebuttal is still possible.

Latif

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com] 
Sent: 12 November 2016 21:04
To: Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet] <latif@ladid.lu>; 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>
Cc: 'Khaled Omar' <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>; ipv6@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPv10.

Hi Latif,

On 12/11/2016 20:17, Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet] wrote:
> Jon Postel will swizel in his grave if v10 is not assigned by IANA first.
> Let's not confuse the market. A working group at ETSI has been formed 
> 6 months ago called NGP ( Next Gereation Protocols) lashing at v4 and 
> v6 to invent a new one.

How incredibly foolish of them.

   Brian

> Also the ITU will jump on this one to occupy the v10 space :-)
> 
> Latif
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E 
> Carpenter
> Sent: 12 November 2016 02:43
> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> Cc: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>; ipv6@ietf.org; 
> ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IPv10.
> 
> On 12/11/2016 14:15, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Right now it seems that you have got a solution proposal for a 
>>> problem, that is IMHO not very clearly described.
>>
>> how about ipv4 and ipv6 are incompatible on the wire and this has 
>> created a multi-decade ipv6 charlie foxtrot?
> 
> Yes, I suggest mentioning that to Vint, Bob and a few others in 1977, 
> so that they can design IPv4 with extensible addresses. People in
> 2016 will be grateful.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 