Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 19 June 2020 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C3B3A08EC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 02:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S5PlkuljTMVx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 02:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F623A08E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 02:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.156.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 05J9fn7c010403 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 02:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1592559723; x=1592646123; i=@elandsys.com; bh=8eQM9PobYG46YBRTffUENXtU4PNk9u/tY4vCjFt8Lig=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=s8zAYofsIiDO+DaE3xOHvON83+O9Po9wOKg10FfXYdPhQ30uhbwswdmhaYSftlqHc jReebJhaG3yM7+VzGlV4aETtAHRrcgCbf49VDYGonGD3BHib0fg+5bIHFYxTJxPY5R eL2ESpg9n4YTtnw+UlLqiIf8wuH8rnSssrDqyihw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200619020845.0aae0620@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 02:40:36 -0700
To: Sean Turner <sean+ietf@sn3rd.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
In-Reply-To: <C5EC1D28-0700-4923-8BB0-09C8D62A3432@gmail.com>
References: <98B3DAEE-F9B7-47C1-AE0E-4559D1572740@gmail.com> <5DE19E46-9DEA-4E93-80DD-A3C076B072DC@ietf.org> <C5EC1D28-0700-4923-8BB0-09C8D62A3432@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/R9ObWqlYUa74P4yxpUtneyo3KpQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:42:22 -0000

Hi Sean,
At 08:45 AM 18-06-2020, Tim Chown wrote:
>Thanks Jay, but the blog doesn't break out the actual online meeting 
>costs from the spreading of "some operational costs" into the meeting costs.

I took a look at the blog article after reading Tim's comment.  There 
is an amount of $295,360 for meeting support expenses.  It looks very 
high figure for online meetings.  Could you please elaborate on why 
the figure seems so high?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy