IETF Logo Mail Archive

Writeup (not) [Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 February 2009 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5173A6C13 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:50:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7sRkT4T7GYV for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:50:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581673A6A09 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:50:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so371648wfd.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:50:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aCX2a1O2kz7FfTyqCbFmiPyzhXRhUV7+vfHKJwLDCiQ=; b=GWwI8YVjjYY3zaseftqvw4pHflFtowEmqdGyfIGwNIvowwjlzGZHISQJ9zLlNgxqx2 EqEKNZKOLsldYySKo/uwJ1ZYqjfz//d6n4JCvgv4MTxVKcUFVQg6JMIzXqQ1yYTofwYC fubsBr+bZNZKSic8RXKRMpY3vLDM7VMEXFEBI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=WozFXJqSSp+fXADhGteBNms/fYyl2eU1bdBnz0UfWDe3JmAfBsNMYHb9JKLS88dvuR TiFXhvovIaOOcpSUWc3szYP/5RfYj2nagBCB9RB9GrUilXtn971wUBE/4rn/oRA4/hh1 XjSiXaPvMNPVOW6ihTjjXPyCdnjdaBVa6HLRk=
Received: by 10.141.48.6 with SMTP id a6mr60085rvk.161.1234389017518; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm754510rvb.4.2009.02.11.13.50.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49934815.3040800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:50:13 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Subject: Writeup (not) [Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard]
References: <73E1DD05-C75B-47F5-92C5-21780818C0F7@colt.net> <01N5DDS79IA800007A@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01N5DDS79IA800007A@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:50:14 -0000

On 2009-02-12 08:09, ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
...
> P.S. I've read the IPR dlsclosure and the patents claims, but what would
> be useful to see is the document shepard writeup. Are those available
> somewhere
> online?  If they are I don't know where to find them and I was unable
> to coerce The Google into dilvulging their location.

For current drafts you should be able to find them via the I-D tracker
history. As far as I can see, this is not the case for this draft. It
was first reviewed by the IESG in May/June 2006, and I think that we
weren't yet putting shepherd writeups in the tracker then. In fact,
there probably wasn't a formal shepherd at that time, for any individual
submission. RFC4858 was not yet out. And of course all that was before
the first IPR disclosure.

    Brian

P.S. It's quite amusing that the tracker (in its public version)
still shows the IESG ballot as it stood in June 2006.

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status