Re: Fully functional email address

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 16 June 2025 01:07 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2EE354AD3A for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rd4HQLA5F6X9 for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855AE354AD34 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1uQyJS-0002P8-2W; Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:07:02 -0400
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:06:55 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Fully functional email address
Message-ID: <6926A7B79CE70CFC602DCAE0@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn3GzHbK3dRwRUTu9XaDBZyBZPF6YC+Hj68_ofm6-QFUsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <18892.1750014795@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <50FFA5F1-6895-4C6C-A4C7-1DA2226CA07B@huitema.net> <CAKr6gn3GzHbK3dRwRUTu9XaDBZyBZPF6YC+Hj68_ofm6-QFUsg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Message-ID-Hash: KZKTZESUGJ3WPQASFILLDHEMEVJQ7MQT
X-Message-ID-Hash: KZKTZESUGJ3WPQASFILLDHEMEVJQ7MQT
X-MailFrom: john-ietf@jck.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RW-ILkj2oq8rwGzerd0Mqy4qe98>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>

George,

+1.  
thanks,
    john


--On Monday, June 16, 2025 06:35 +0930 George Michaelson
<ggm@algebras.org> wrote:

> Email isn't dying. It is changing. I don't like the changes and I
> think you don't either but saying it's dying creates a false sense
> of doom around it.
> 
> I think this isn't the place to debate it. Centralisation of
> services is typified by what is happening to mail.
> 
> What matters here is the ground rules we set for ourselves in terms
> of expectations in email and behaviour in document production.
> 
> I think in that context "I refuse to use X because" isn't helpful.
> The mission is to engange on documents not to strike blows for
> email hosting freedoms.
> 
> G
> 
> (Personal opinion. Sent from a train on the Nullarbor plain using
> centrally managed monopolistic mail)
> 
> G
> 
> On Mon, 16 June 2025, 05:17 Christian Huitema,
> <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On Jun 15, 2025, at 12:14 PM, Michael Richardson
>> > <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
> >
> > Paul Wout䩣㸀㸀 㸀 ᐀