Meet Only line - I object

Fred Baker <> Tue, 02 February 2021 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949693A0D71; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:31:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kfRygdPojHz; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186433A0D70; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id n42so20779362ota.12; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:31:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to:cc; bh=RaCSlIgSIBU9hyLRFQGLlFHJXiAOATs/5Ohc77WLJys=; b=ng+JQH6y86+g6xXvEgnB1HlCY2ZUnfTNb+ZONSm0O7WHejIkGDb0ILw/giXIp6pZJA Kz7iwqC4y466iqRnOl6N5AqJEfXdujP8sIDzLBqdDsv77ZpZ0N9G4aGQBMQJ/ZiOMCF7 t/VO7b70cMRO5bKe0fsdjt29gSw5N7mor9sQnrJkJeZLUu4MijI+xmNKVaLyhTQ7OBWr vhATI2ckaFDkTjjn/51kEfoE1Zy9pbeYLr4v1p+ZhwuBcN9jVzrPeEMNTVJhAnXLlDjT Pcr0G/U2YgTshkMadaK6wxHVl0c44XJnzuPw9S1AdLXwUsjQgTAoy5zB5iF0WP9wY6a/ v9pg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to:cc; bh=RaCSlIgSIBU9hyLRFQGLlFHJXiAOATs/5Ohc77WLJys=; b=GliZIv8wG+YdUBZIqr+ryPLYIFt6oMVpSqxn6BjCUdM6peXl1ihjGSZJ9jbUjddU5f kYJG6YE2fgs/4AwSjkV3ISmhhr2ZigPXcmu8f5CoTzFgcWGDBEI/77r03COqX4rZfjYl NHAH+5sAoF2DiyRWBXip8i4yd61xLjkaXs04UdPIUAyZQVD7V68uRUh7n/hj9goQkL9m zri3FOX4W8SUTfuVbmgCNJJvSz95od3Ssayy9tRkQAj+oeka1MIcqzMwbAJPztPdCcpT T8SuFGhzOMY08QRgjyGqCEKCd897ipLHG+qMYs3glF7wVntQ7q5WXThnjybMoohBed5S NzbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gOClvSQzg4vkAoDyMIVHROyyBhd32rr9tRkHbnNtM9KOSbKTC YimaMFk8S94r1KlxUqFcqCqJ05Zfwd8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJrYaUkmFmBVBnfBljv5avvBHkIEjy/CViXkfqiCilKgCtMYtvRR/UVPwuFUkUfKGKaTP7Hg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1dad:: with SMTP id z13mr21408oti.223.1612290659324; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:30:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1702:290:6530:bd1f:dc5a:48a0:eb2d? ([2600:1702:290:6530:bd1f:dc5a:48a0:eb2d]) by with ESMTPSA id d17sm4746274otk.3.2021. (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:30:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <>
X-Google-Original-From: Fred Baker <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-D02B3812-D1D3-4CB7-926F-8158AC9C5749
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Meet Only line - I object
Message-Id: <>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:30:57 -0800
To: The IESG <>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18D52)
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:31:02 -0000

Looking at, I noted that there is no mailing list for this. Had there been one, this note would have been posted to it. I apologize for the wide distribution.

I can see setting up a policy for meetings that are cancelled by Force Majuere, but the fact that we have had such doesn’t call for stopping having meetings. The fact is that face-to-face meetings have value - people can get to know each other and set up a social basis for discussion, if nothing else. I can see scaling back - our European colleagues find the summer meeting timing awkward at best. But I don;’t see the temporary effect of having a global pandemic as justification for simply shutting down to mailing lists - which would be the likely effect of failing to meet.

So yes, I think we would do well to meet for IETF 111 and on.

Sent from my iPad