Re: New-comers

Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu> Fri, 16 April 2021 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E6F3A30B0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 299HoT7QHlsn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com (mail-pg1-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4745D3A30AF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id t22so19822754pgu.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8NY5Yhtwps8geB2+hhbqYvFE6ZsRVxq7QlWQ5YFmg2M=; b=gasDt2DqRI9dYCrOSMbJ+sqx+foVF442+53W0Ocl/qUrt4+qHX0MkV+15XvDRd88rK BdLUZIU/q+tLmd7dSc19td9LfBoCC5CtHr9m9ZacxyW0GgmKcwxPMfMKGgKOJ1zW6Pid A0YkFaYSp90lBtvOAP88lI44ckhNcBujfj4DOMT2P62DsGrOThjP0PSlTOPaYf3+OPjx vDyF00DHeT5sjSkDwFIkK8L5mcSKXpTyuwFwFEoQx24HGB9fOxSNoHVh1zGm72kopodp nZrDX/114m5goDvdcHEAFsWgkgvwqrrEPaVrnfwEyNizHflsc/EgIVpbkT21EDgkz4Sn thjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530N/IFiVt8nXHa1+WszHdVdp3nIqBwu3r9SxFHS1Q4CXR625JV2 hrntac6harRmAVO+rz6fKSmkYYYxyZ5fVw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCWrlMB5cgflrvr9OVEC92NotlV1riX9LJkpHPcDSR4haoJkfnOkjhgrN8UZA/PskijyyIMg==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9312:0:b029:24b:f2b4:d8e6 with SMTP id 18-20020aa793120000b029024bf2b4d8e6mr9054529pfj.31.1618598587507; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9300:791:35c0:192e:3c23:58d3? ([2601:646:9300:791:35c0:192e:3c23:58d3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a24sm5634369pfk.95.2021.04.16.11.43.06 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: New-comers
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <0DEC3038-BF96-4E9A-AE80-0F3347D67AAB@me.com>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <e785f3a9-14b0-a990-a7ac-a9b2eb560282@alumni.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:43:05 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0DEC3038-BF96-4E9A-AE80-0F3347D67AAB@me.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Rave5qojyddzqG7JsQkpqkuu_Ao>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:43:13 -0000

Hi -

On 2021-04-16 10:43 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
...
> If newcomers risk being "snarled at" it is only due to our own
> culture and abusive behavior and not due to their lack of preparation.
...

Over the years I was able to arm-twist several coworkers into attending
IETF meetings.  All were sharp people with plenty of clue, and I took
pains to describe IETF culture and norms in advance.  In general, their
reaction prior to the actual meeting was "it can't possibly be that
bad."  They all made it through the meetings without being attacked too
badly, but the attacks and generally uncivil behavior between *other*
participants led them to become quite reluctant to ever attend
another IETF meeting.  The common post-meeting reaction was "you
should have warned me - it was so much more awful than you described."

It was only because our business depended on it that I was able to
get them to go to any subsequent meetings, but it also led me to
conclude that IETF meetings can be painful experiences for anyone
with a shred of empathy.  One needn't be the object of the
unpleasantness to find the unpleasantness unpleasant.

Randy