Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com> Thu, 23 September 2004 16:02 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA25677; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:02:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAWAB-0002pA-3F; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:09:44 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAVnc-0002wM-Fe; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:46:24 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAVi8-0001ct-MJ for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA23989 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.thingmagic.com ([207.31.248.245] helo=thingmagic.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAVox-0002Kb-4M for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:47:47 -0400
Received: from [24.61.30.237] (account margaret HELO [192.168.2.2]) by thingmagic.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 161826; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:36:09 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: margaret@mail.thingmagic.com
Message-Id: <p06020473bd789ba791e1@[192.168.2.2]>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20040923103103.02345cb0@localhost>
References: <414EDAA2.9080205@thinkingcat.com> <414EDAA2.9080205@thinkingcat.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20040923103103.02345cb0@localhost>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:15 -0400
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Subject: Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Hi Joel, At 10:35 AM -0400 9/23/04, Joel M. Halpern wrote: >Two minor comments: >1) The references to "the IASF bank account" should probably be >relaxed to "IASF fund accounts" or "IASF accounts". As written, it >presumes that there is exactly one bank account, and that separation >of funds is by bank control. While the later is probably a good >idea, I don't think this BCP is the place to call that out. And the >exact number of bank accounts used by IASF (0, 1, 5, or ...) is not >a concern for this BCP. Yes. Someone else also pointed this out. If we go forward with Scenario O, the BCP should probably just say that the money will be kept in separate account(s) and let the business management folks determine the right form and structure for those accounts. >2) The schedule calls for seating the IAOC on January 15, and hiring >the IAD by the end of January. Given that the search committee can >not be appointed until the board is seated, it seems that item is >either an impossible schedule or assumes facts not in evidence. Actually, the schedule calls for the interim IAOC to be seated on 15-Nov and for that group to begin the recruitment process. The actual hiring wouldn't occur until after the BCP is approved by the IESG and ISOC (Jan 17th). So, this is a ~2-month recruitment process. which is still aggressive but perhaps not impossible. There are some compromises involved for quick start-up (like having the nomcom appointed members join later), but we've tried to be careful to make any major decisions (appointments, hiring, contracts) follow the appropriate levels of community approval and to have all of the major decisions made by people who will be responsible for the long-term consequences (good or bad) of those decisions. I'd be very interested to know if folks think that we've gotten this wrong -- either the principles/priorities, or the details of schedule we've put forward... Margaret _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Leslie Daigle
- Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on wher… Leslie Daigle
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here John C Klensin
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Scott W Brim
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Ted Hardie
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Erik Huizer
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here scott bradner
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here scott bradner
- Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming: further thoughts o… John C Klensin
- Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further t… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Tax excemption (Re: Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… John C Klensin
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Karl Auerbach
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Sam Hartman
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Karl Auerbach
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Tony Hain
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Kai Henningsen
- Scenario C (was: Scenario O) Kai Henningsen
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Kai Henningsen
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines