IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC 5378 "contributions"

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 21 January 2009 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194E328C12E; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:23:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59F728C12E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:23:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1XHWeJ9u9AKk for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:23:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED57428C0E5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1LPdz8-000Pnz-CO; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:23:14 -0500
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:23:13 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: "Tom.Petch" <sisyphus@dial.pipex.com>, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Subject: Re: RFC 5378 "contributions"
Message-ID: <23ABF386BAA2259BB7386F56@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <000201c97ba9$394ff280$0601a8c0@allison>
References: <50E312B117033946BA23AA102C8134C6031B3970@SDCPEXCCL2MX.wilmerhale.com> <20090115035256.GB81320@shinkuro.com> <CFD40B6FB7A87F31F3D9CABE@PST.JCK.COM> <0882F36F-6800-4E5E-BC9F-EBA8C7D1877D@multicasttech.com> <20090115142929.GE30522@mit.edu> <D01F4A5C-9507-4005-B4A0-C00CE2E6973E@multicasttech.com> <20090116002314.GB10683@mit.edu> <6.2.5.6.2.20090116063219.02bc6ab8@resistor.net> <87zlhr9plo.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <000201c97ba9$394ff280$0601a8c0@allison>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org +1

--On Tuesday, January 20, 2009 15:20 +0100 "Tom.Petch"
<sisyphus@dial.pipex.com> wrote:

>...
> Underlying this, I believe that if only the IPR WG had not had
> to spend so much time discussing and re-discussing and
> re-re-discussing ... this issue, then may be, just may be, we
> would have had more time to focus on the transition
> arrangements that we identified the need for in RFC5377 s.3.
> In which case, this thread and all the other related ones
> would never have occurred.
> 
> So, in all seriousness, I do see this re-raising of this
> issue, by you and others, as impeding our ability to solve the
> problem that most needs solving, that of
> moving forward to a world where our Contributions do contain
> greater rights to allow derivative works.  Which, ironically,
> is a prerequisite for what you want.




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status