Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 19 February 2020 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593001208C5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:50:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5iGCr9LCn84o for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57F651208CC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id o28so715445qkj.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:50:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+yX5stCzrYPeDJHCXH/LdsGVlDhhRJUYejF5SyIwgUs=; b=kMLps7TBtQXeDcpU9zKdEu4ze8k8lf8jg3p5Ysidc114ucjCHonAq5yn687ryEjyLU aOUjJH7y3akfZxe+An7UMtMw0UEhsvCH0CmQOOaKAU8fLQLpppdZO9R7q47tLnelNJH7 j2kzIJCsQS/f+YxvjQvOq8o/Pp/eFoE7ebNWtxYYa+N5dJwTJLM2jW0bOu6HSHKNrZeK 4jlf6ziG/pZxUvzwZ9s7FOM4ycSd/E1mNU9erH3wJBLbk3+onitm7lU4taYjgNJtly0x z1Ep2fxXs5sh7pVzmiPtbZcqas2IQ1vp7lt/C6JQJW2+v8JlyaYWcJ0wbhGVBi3/kBvZ FYWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+yX5stCzrYPeDJHCXH/LdsGVlDhhRJUYejF5SyIwgUs=; b=AM3yOcIDjWv+0YfzbJ9asXK5x5NZP6O8oyPneg3u4n/0HZZPZzosVLOqysx/g7IReP /F/+7ybgAzGOdJcM6kYWkn7J44DzL55saUxezSl2qk9wV7Kv6CujyjU8B6CItcVpmN+C ew+ZRvUXD3H12EQdf6HljY8d7hX+5zo2Ow0nqfby42LN8uxOSzYviArq2z+w//VmYQPx Fi9p8v8lyn7/0HSxX7BrY9/0Ecsw22QaGAGmNhAj0zX9FJSquf4sydLBa53vbQDa69Ql hGlVOoJ/FjrCDsX7Qfbqn8uYSgwKf4gEGAa2OgyZl77wW8eHwdvBmRj8SEASEM6mO3Un vq0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUxtpvQUME++y6EqbStx4pzAyaDQ7Q1bKpdGDkHHSESzxU6uOo h/Ii0Fl2jiJ02ECMrapwU/gbgKEcJPqSaPCHNWc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwlBSRsNW39aJalers09d+v3A4PpH0AVv/18o/WrhwIDaQ9/LsVN66/hqZWqvxHV3WLa8f2Jb2h9bIBwjvQhb4=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:903:: with SMTP id 3mr24241309qkj.388.1582131055346; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:50:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PR3P194MB0843ACAE01F33CEC57266A1AAE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <PR3P194MB0843ACAE01F33CEC57266A1AAE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:50:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL9jLab3GN5eEwbC1cHQkG9onUn5rry7OMykQ7MiRGo90TKizg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Rf7VJ-uVZ37Yd55cCVXIqiRzVgo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:50:59 -0000

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:28 AM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:

>
> From what I see in the real world, IPv4 still dominating and almost nobody started using IPv6, and also, I didn’t find any solution applied practically in today’s networks for this issue.
>

I don't think it's accurate to say: "almost nobody started using ipv6"

https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/2018/state-of-ipv6-deployment-2018/

these numbers are ~2yrs old... but 25% is not "almost nobody".