Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com> Sun, 13 November 2016 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3A012949A; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:24:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1XxdVHjrzcq; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80F812956F; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x4so24574429oix.2; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:24:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fGOBK6f+QrWxCtbF1mdFx0D9nNAALq0rTg9509KltR4=; b=ZbvO0draWUoysXmDtGWH4ZVM5noKOD6KKsCrKFGW9/ugMaO3lNH/Jqnaz8KLz9xxLj Mc7Qx+l2ZqZoL08obWaEAhINBe8UO7+B0iBU1ZcRpF/53GrXJ5hnq36e7lJnA1/VLkG3 CwcI0/JZxiyzLEhA/YCfpEzWfav5N9AbsGzeKJ9CV28Qy5tU4k2IswgY/wcVOZByYtFJ 6DsOcjcs8NceKPzpuDYXZ4vPu/bFTpHrLwkTNTKrTMJtZf7/lvH7qEG3t4g5+DozSHDv b6+dkq2ni+KNtjD/A8NmpMshbCgtnVJEUV0RCfdqBgX1cRguzRdFzTVR2Wd6Q6+hmqhJ Hzgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fGOBK6f+QrWxCtbF1mdFx0D9nNAALq0rTg9509KltR4=; b=YLBHRMRrBFPk5ByzpctIlNVP9TAE/VW4HlMAxn0KbD2VTclwrn8jBB5x4OBnXWsIdy 7bonQ4iXo8XtlOUhGIBK8LKFmMjicqAWWmavOAz7tx+y8XG8qEFz9b98O8iYzSTR9jDQ yCO+T7Fa5N94ICE7dqbLekXLnmXkfqi3OTfEWKzX0rnd+8+I03d/eR808vEf1dMFZT+R 2CdDZuIzB4hTnUjTh7ZHPV04doxPILbg0TIEfSVlgVByRmEQbrw2C5RO82PMTJOqZ5Sg EBRin9z4krCl6wL9aApYkcSsSRXK8HsgIaNIMCWbT7rVZv76tTItUTbWEl6Kx+/rKG5F mXDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd9fw3pfdOLBAr4hWIxI1uwPSqbvtCzJvqoA/i5Fc7QJB867XhgrhzB4uPRSRuc0Q==
X-Received: by 10.157.11.68 with SMTP id p4mr4473410otd.113.1478996642817; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([75.174.45.51]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g17sm5249064otd.38.2016.11.12.16.24.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
To: iaoc@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160316170239.30920.41218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160318005648.0e552fc8@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net> <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$@olddog.co.uk> <56F912B8.9070001@gondrom.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20160714083607.0ce35198@elandnews.com> <0AA26172-A842-4E6C-B7C4-DFFEA25DE22B@sobco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160715083734.0bf97f78@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20161112065759.0b031850@resistor.net>
From: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
Organization: http://SoftwareAndServices.NET
Message-ID: <5827B2A0.9030800@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:24:00 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20161112065759.0b031850@resistor.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms090200050400040703040405"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RfjgDJDFULng2pVCS9GZ_XDAFTk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:24:05 -0000

> ... According to the IETF Administrative Director the IETF is
> required by California law to have
> an accurate privacy policy on its websites.

-- 

Is IETF,org a commercial website or online service?

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=bpc&group=22001-23000&file=22575-22579

... The operator of a commercial website or online service must 
conspicuously post a privacy policy on its website. According to 
CalOPPA, conspicuously posting a privacy policy means: ...



--
Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US)
DouglasRoyer@gmail.com
714-989-6135