IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Mon, 14 June 2021 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35083A138B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 22:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f3K8Tyjm3tvN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 22:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f177.google.com (mail-yb1-f177.google.com [209.85.219.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56B3D3A1389 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 22:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f177.google.com with SMTP id m9so13762177ybo.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 22:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OYc+GPbJsDoH5GljO6qoqWfzvoq28/F/u1+199vgHYY=; b=jsZhSn+fbr6MWhp9sDMWVUDIIN5lnErsnnTOdFOixAr+bPGJxUVY8kwKQ1bEBx+yUG nV1ywXdXC+JH18J500N5ulcEReSknOFV8iLXpVCXG2QjDuVptZCZMLGHoHT9sIdHMvsY CgEjYBfBT7oBzs8VxSIqJunR8JvInX0JihE5ZmhuZikdF44yQGxgIbVrXPnkQN9lS8hf nlK+9et29qreGy3nJEJm0bynEqYNx9TdaI/9LmF3w9Q2I15Vd6FFq8GS0JoFzzEsuo0V Y1QbOwl4wJMkB17FUBA22eTFnT0gqYOZpDhqNfFFsOlO9M5x69C0Lp0k5OupMDNVJhMM /GyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531RnBEy+lTMwuTtnhuz4zQpqRR1JzJhsWsTQVsFRo8cJPNwwcJ2 /WZTy9i+SYA2MN7BkOgqBn5j2r6/eDGf1JA0azs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5TLk7uQySo/r6SsW/kDxMPO5JmQT24YTb82f8dWeyxjzGhN0HkAvAsqdYdYCEmR8N9cufqrAMW1zC6GCoujM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:1b0b:: with SMTP id b11mr23102896ybb.302.1623649179402; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 22:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2BF6EC60-8B32-4171-B236-D9D038B3135B@yahoo.co.uk> <20210611174521.CD568F22E4A@ary.qy> <20210611182604.GA36947@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <ff6d912d-b0c6-4550-8d16-a79348e45699@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CAKKJt-enK4XmMuapke9LX-3TVuyg9j12zS9RyWXqvOT6Vbk5Mw@mail.gmail.com> <7606DFCE59EA95E72625E0FF@PSB> <26cf60f0-a007-a53f-f386-069526c31be4@cs.tcd.ie> <BB343401F7F2798A7EC7D196@JcK-HP5> <BFCE99A0-FB41-4B53-994E-AA7FFE1DEEE4@tzi.org> <CB9550F5FE92CCCC02B759F0@JcK-HP5> <A907F4B7-D6BA-4EE1-8C80-B7987C52DEFB@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <A907F4B7-D6BA-4EE1-8C80-B7987C52DEFB@tzi.org>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:39:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwj-jYzZ_SdjnMskuX7=tKyjC4Ur+GirWi4r6xYHLwUSwg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000094051c05c4b348d7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RjIbfdIqBCXFproRDjoirc7ANMo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 05:39:45 -0000

Your concern is that as an RFC author, people might not be able to bring
their concerns to you.

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:50 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> On 14. Jun 2021, at 01:55, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Ned and his explanation of why the balance we have
> > today is just about right.
>
> This is all wrong.
>
> Normally, it is the Germans who see the potential problems of some
> innovation and run around preventing things from happening because
> something *could* go wrong.
> We even have a common word for that stereotype that is so widely spread in
> Germany, the “Bedenkenträger” (= “bearer of concerns”).
>
> Now, if I find myself on the side of arguing for change where others are
> clinging to the status quo, I find this deeply concerning.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>
> (If you didn’t notice, this is all tongue in cheek.
> But I’m still amazed by what dangerous animals these ex-RFC-authors must
> be that we can’t expose them any further.)
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email