Subject: Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
From: Sandra Murphy <[email-masked]>
To: Rob Austein <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:16:22 -0400
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>

On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Rob Austein <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> I prefer Richard's option 2 (allow but do not require linebreaks),
> which is what RFC 6490 RP implementations had to support anyway.
> 

Richard’s option 2 allows insertion of line breaks in a TAL.

Should we add a “Relying parties MUST ignore line breaks/whitespace” as well?

Richard’s message agrees that everyone’s relying party code he’s looked at does that anyway.

—Sandy