IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 19 March 2008 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A6328C2CE; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.173, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h43RF4qe6Qfd; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530453A6A0A; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747C93A6A47 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f3JfbsO5gXKj for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EFE3A69CD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k40so208530wah.25 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sbopwnJKzGk7L4RzJk+aomTuDkJJ+n+oXox8tAVK6zg=; b=DO/gPfhz2XhGwgsN5q895QOOH0ow9NQ6BE8LYBkAbT7YEeYOk362egKWaT2MHMdMpAK3ZcQNebuObTzrRWUuQm2P7boccyaXQUVRqfipgcc8xQAN4QmPF4FcmBc8jgTbcyvFqR/scoKJmdsnYEKVN7GnI6K2LSjwLTFHnlBpAB0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AGDqXtvEO0QMvRjE6VS1VH9z7M7juXDskCDDLprAZGHEIvv44OLCitIdxQ0LwA6AM1ov2vpihnEnq67dPQYP/qudyhfuUfM/Tgs+/zjX+wPLMkKfSjWQt1VdmFMPqFPmWRkZsVtycORLvpM3g2I4eUGTt2HafiVI+Oyn4ovnmB0=
Received: by 10.114.66.2 with SMTP id o2mr392262waa.102.1205895705866; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? ( [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y11sm10723343pod.9.2008.03.18.20.01.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <47E08215.8070600@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:01:41 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glen Zorn <gzorn@arubanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
References: <47DF04FC.4060706@cs.umd.edu> <A3DA4C2546E1614D8ACC896746CDCF29E7BF6E@aruba-mx1.arubanetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3DA4C2546E1614D8ACC896746CDCF29E7BF6E@aruba-mx1.arubanetworks.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, hokey@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Glen,


On 2008-03-19 04:31, Glen Zorn wrote:
...
> Some of us don't subscribe to the IETF list (due to the extremely poor
> S/N ratio).  Someone did forward me Bernard's original message & to me
> it appears to fall squarely into the N category (either that or it is an
> early April 1 RFC candidate).  I understand, though, that it is actually
> receiving serious discussion on the IETF list, so I'm happy that you are
> bringing some of that discussion to this forum.  Of course, common
> courtesy would have required that the WG the work of which is being
> disparaged in outrageous fashion be included in the discussion but
> courtesy seems to be in short supply.

Setting aside the tone of that remark, ietf@ietf.org *is* the recommended
forum for IETF Last Call comments (see the text of every Last Call message).
So I believe that Bernard chose the correct list to launch his opinion.
I can certainly agree that resolving this issue could be better done
on the WG list.

     Brian
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email