Re: Specific Questions about Registration details for IETF 108

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 09 June 2020 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505F13A0C39 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.212
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4nBpSPxo_MCu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9756B3A0BDF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.118.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 059I59uu010243 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1591725921; x=1591812321; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Ps0qAvsW/gCveis8JKo1rHrGiqiVntys6TEP/IubPdE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=naOQuAHW3qqnwjUmDVTTbgoAOS4RuC73szIL/GqcBorIJ7a3cNRj+pNTBy3s623PZ GT5sSdu6FX7pT7gHKNL3CdiQyxCKBwnucAMwKdulubC/paDEdDPuNyw537BotGAEIn ghe/cbmdcVdsrfFa0We+AqHFkMnpIwQE8uQhiMbc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200609102611.0c7c5db0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:56:32 -0700
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Specific Questions about Registration details for IETF 108
In-Reply-To: <511A3EE0-976B-40FF-813A-58CC115E760A@gmail.com>
References: <159062833754.6110.5826748635235943562@ietfa.amsl.com> <3B19A920-9D33-4E3D-8B8B-8134A5E55316@gmail.com> <86D7C39D-9778-4408-B7CA-CB74E9572B1B@ietf.org> <511A3EE0-976B-40FF-813A-58CC115E760A@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RmwU7IBd-g-5389aZqaVTEO-le0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:05:35 -0000

Hi Bob,
At 08:07 PM 03-06-2020, Bob Hinden wrote:
>Charging different rates based on when you register doesn't have 
>much effect on this.   You need the same level of support 
>independent of when people register and how much they pay.   I bet 
>you have a good idea of how many people will attend independent of this.

My guess is that the number of previous remote attendees will 
decrease to around 150.  Revenue projection would be around 
$150,000.  I did not factor in a new restriction [1] as I only 
noticed it a few minutes ago.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. The IETF is prohibiting the distribution or broadcasting of 
recordings of the events without written consent.