Return-Path: <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 798E33A6B9F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:10:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5A5aBHqkcS2D for
 <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:10:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by
 core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036F03A68E3 for <ietf@ietf.org>;
 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:10:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1
 #35243) id <01NGIIGBQ6E8005EBP@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org;
 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:10:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id
 <01NGI9MKR1KG0002QL@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from
 NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ietf@ietf.org;
 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:09:59 -0800 (PST)
From: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01NGIIG5G1V60002QL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types
 Registration) to Draft Standard
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed,
 25 Nov 2009 15:05:51 -0500" <4B0D8E1F.2090402@att.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; Format=flowed
References: <20091125193421.7B9B93A6B2A@core3.amsl.com>
 <4B0D8E1F.2090402@att.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve;
 t=1259190461; i=@mrochek.com; bh=uCHyFIWfznwzP4+ZrT3RMMwlXACCZvZOSKIs0uuI7Vo=;
 h=From:Message-id:Date:Subject:In-reply-to:MIME-version: Content-type:References:To;
 b=C2B68Wkg0Peyz8BW81RUpT39xnFtRS0RxKBvnX2U7X241DQ3detl/akHt4ZKwpMQG
 XvDMddf/rRo9PkVyRI1S55lK1++iCN430VgKAiacjh92YL2r2X84hMzII9ChRCtGfP
 0J6uM1ylhMLEgMhS+tCksis6hu8l1eQ3ZzfF8EXc=
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
 <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
 <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:10:23 -0000

> The IESG wrote:
> > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> > the following document:
> >
> > - 'ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration '
> >   RFC 3848 as a Draft Standard

+1 

				Ned

