Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU> Tue, 08 July 2008 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3223A3A68AE; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2CB3A68AE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dX+dSESYwN0X for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC323A686C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gra.isi.edu (gra.isi.edu [128.9.160.133]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m68Fp4hf000593; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Received: (from braden@localhost) by gra.isi.edu (8.9.3/8.8.6) id IAA15104; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:51:04 -0700
Message-Id: <200807081551.IAA15104@gra.isi.edu>
To: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: braden@isi.edu
Cc: john-ietf@jck.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

  *>  
  *> > 	* was not even examined in the "requirements" review
  *> > 	that led up to RFC 1123 and is not referenced there.
  *> 
  *> 	RFC 1123 -> RFC 952 -> RFC 921
  *>  	

Your "->" arrows here apparently mean only "contains a reference to".
This is not an explicit dependence relationship like "updates" or
"obsoletes", and nothing can be imfered from "contains a reference
to" except thaton Postel was academically thorough.

Bob Braden
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf