Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 03 December 2012 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833AB21F8583 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 05:48:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1v043wtWy58p for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 05:48:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140F821F8581 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 05:48:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D422A9A4003 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:48:19 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id StTKCd1R3L1F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:48:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.10.65] (unknown [207.87.202.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AAE9A4001 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:48:19 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BC89D3.8030701@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:48:09 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3F85F6C1-7CE7-4C14-9C98-7DA1F75AEA2C@vigilsec.com>
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <01a701cdcd81$7d365380$77a2fa80$@olddog.co.uk> <50BBA236.9010603@dcrocker.net> <50BBB79C.40106@gmail.com> <50BBB862.8090209@gmail.com> <50BBB940.1020302@gmail.com> <m2zk1wui8h.wl%randy@psg.com> <50BBEAA7.3070600@gmail.com> <50BBEE5F.3060906@gmail.com> <50BBF121.8050400@lacnic.net> <50BC89D3.8030701@gmail.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:48:09 -0000

>> 	Perhaps I did, but I am talking about Working Group Drafts
>> 
>> "1.1.  What is a Working Group Draft?
>> 
>>   Documents under development in the IETF community are distributed as
>>   Internet Drafts (I-D).  
> 
> Melinda and/or Randy have said what I want to say, but as a factual
> clarification to the draft, the above statement is only part of the
> truth. Documents under development in the IRTF are distributed as
> I-Ds, and so are documents about random subjects by random people,
> especially those intended as independent submissions to the RFC Editor.
> So a more complete statement is
> 
> Documents under development inside or outside the IETF community are
> distributed as Internet Drafts (I-D).

Even better:

The I-D repository is managed by the IETF Secretariat under the direction of the IESG, but the repository is used by the IETF, IRTF, IAB, and the broader Internet community to distribute documents.

Russ