Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 24 January 2017 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5034312962C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:40:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=AYsjtOh+; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=P8oGMSgU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39JLmm-VIsem for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D84681295A6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 36819 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2017 16:40:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=8fd1.58878364.k1701; bh=ifMDb7ZphvDeSBUQ4jHEQCq4IRbpw5cV0gGky6DWKoI=; b=AYsjtOh+RQInQ1iu5KFRYFv3y8kMVbsJJREoN7P3gx1MOxz+mdgVV12uoTAMLgOx7ffzONct+7gD6M5VjVF/MD/RMRoAzb5D0894zUxkozw7R2+eUrM9nWxjDjSou/pqLFoF5p9zR2enDbaAI+o9CLjBKvcuXOObXdAh4hk1n+hUiDXi7SzS2s0pyESDQf4Vn5kMNFV3zqEvUd7411+9cAtsAQlFZ26OIkfIkPolSiJEAQMha2RrdWXqpbIZZhyf
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=8fd1.58878364.k1701; bh=ifMDb7ZphvDeSBUQ4jHEQCq4IRbpw5cV0gGky6DWKoI=; b=P8oGMSgUQNA12zl9Ywu8zsgubHZy7rEX9bAJ34HeMZlaTCRscNJjFTsjdPawUOtTS+GxaOFLKj6bWaKyPRhso6ezHvoHb4xzDa/7OBgDCzpjvQC41ua4nUOZHggReRXPfBWoNi6S3Q04FnrSr8YW5ZUKvotHpjbQC05N9IOAvygwgtG0WiNoqyFCF31cF9GMic4b8w/VZevlec+9xRdnn50zrr9niExhUCD31gbJDZrFbWVZ6Pvl94WoSnpAiG6j
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 24 Jan 2017 16:40:04 -0000
Date: 24 Jan 2017 11:40:04 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1701241129250.84185@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <2A6C1E77A2FDB3E4147305EA@PSB>
References: <20170124020138.65213.qmail@ary.lan> <2A6C1E77A2FDB3E4147305EA@PSB>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/S-kxhMvfWEDLUmiXihCSkST0-Yg>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:40:07 -0000

> Have you read the spec, or are you just responding to my notes
> and/or Patrik's?

I reread the spec, which was a good idea.  It says the domain names can 
contain U-labels and NR-LDH ASCII labels, which seems correct.  That 
forbids both A-labels and dodgy stuff that looks like A-labels but isn't.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly