IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom procedures revision

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 27 August 2015 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9423D1A9022 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zed-7xKecdPx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D79E1A8A9B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgk12 with SMTP id gk12so15895267wic.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=NqTjr04boXOjf8TQTkZX+9LUiy/kycTvC0fCS5xZ9Tc=; b=NZ+pAmXeQoGAqCBF1cfw7TQNOUUADS81GdTd7J7U3CVUB4zlR3pS0Gl5ty0+RxdJ2i Kd+y0jwnXMRI26h4kcMP0qi0eEsne3iw7qI3J//klbVC1cPkXuWSO6YhR5h5X1IWcbUV ZNPT2nrRwgostU8NxHwJROMiBXcg6CpDJdHfX1bcnlCm2FaFD+lX0ZEjJywuQMBUB7M1 Byfz40BkKGFcLPhYWcRSBIUv1Z8GdCqL1QtIuk5SsBzlSwmmASJNZRgAk2PbnQkQUR6J Vl969h1Mjv0p1RNt4t8NcWOwOVZnSUR9e66NqBMnB/qkYrrjmBqcHAYc/E8wA03nhLGI gQYQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.191.129 with SMTP id gy1mr6448322wjc.86.1440698077252; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwYJzFZT=OgWqiiTw-n6mvb3PPusRtArmPs_d4_qpLfmpg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_KsNP=_nwp2wrckXtHF8ZSxrQTvf9UKbAMpt68BiiCFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_KsNP=_nwp2wrckXtHF8ZSxrQTvf9UKbAMpt68BiiCFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:54:26 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbhhqG1qoHbBrymPQrU31qjswPAhdeJBqVdRj2L4AR80A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom procedures revision
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b873a181f92b7051e4ea94d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/S1XmRPM572G4l6WxMS4UJ0plMag>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:54:40 -0000

Have a look at Appendix F. I plan to fill out Section 10 once we know for
sure which changes have consensus rather than a few points that might still
be fluid.

-MSK

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015, 08:21 Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Murray,
>
> Sorry that I maybe not following the points, may be they were on the list,
> but the draft needs to have the points of changes. I think section 10 is
> important, so I can know the changes to RFC7437, this section is already
> known by the authors but I am not sure why still it is not drafted. For the
> it is important so I can know the improvements to the procedure in abstract
> (even the introduction refers to this section 10). Therefore, the draft is
> not clear and I cannot decide, and it may take a lot of time of the readers
> to understand without knowing the improvements/changes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> AB
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Some months ago I started the work of editing a revision to the NomCom
>> procedures (RFC7437bis).  We made progress on some points, but seem to have
>> stalled on revising the requirements for qualifying to serve on NomCom.
>>
>> The draft I have recently expired.  Is there any interest in taking
>> another run at this now?  Alternatively, is it worth publishing what we did
>> accomplish, and leaving that one point for a later attempt?
>>
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc7437bis/
>>
>> -MSK
>>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email