IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF chair's blog

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Mon, 25 February 2013 11:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBCD21F9273 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:11:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwgfwbkshy1A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514FB21F89F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (p5481BC8E.dip.t-dialin.net [84.129.188.142]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D281C0C069D; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:11:23 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: IETF chair's blog
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <512B0E64.2030101@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:11:24 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <96CB57D2-68EA-4AC5-92AD-90CEA37E2A93@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <1BBAE003-DEA4-462A-998D-863F6FF90A69@ietf.org> <51298B1E.60007@lacnic.net> <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org> <8A832DDC-1D5E-4C1B-87BB-36A384937480@lacnic.net> <512B0A2D.3050102@acm.org> <512B0B20.2000403@lacnic.net> <512B0C7E.5010900@250bpm.com> <512B0E64.2030101@acm.org>
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:11:27 -0000

On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> On 02/24/2013 11:02 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
>> On 25/02/13 07:56, Arturo Servin wrote:
>> 
>>> If it were to collaborate, an ietf application with open standards should
>>> be the way forward.
>> 
>> Moreover, entities controlling these social platforms are, presumably,
>> also participating in IETF. So, using these tools would give one party
>> unfair advantage -- ability to promote or obscure individual
>> discussions/threads/posts, ban users etc.
> 
> Exactly.  And it bothers me that we are not making much progress in having our
> own remote participant service and have to rely on Webex.
Couldn't we use one based on RTCWeb (in the near future)?

Best regards
Michael
> 
> - -- 
> Marc Petit-Huguenin
> Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
> Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
> Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRKw5bAAoJECnERZXWan7ESloQAIbg7xr93BwSjH8cNheN5zBg
> CVmoXV7ZqQdzQgZfHDjjwTBk3KSm6y99lzjyMQX3t/tqKWnqJH4jG7dVbtyGHAU8
> +Q5j04tVaJ8S+fShS1SIJ5ySu+vjpTMF932++GkMWVsqklJw/hGDekH63dRdD7cK
> k2cQ4rcakHhx8n8rfA/JKRh+bwCN65GJH0+4E/SSf1RQmuYOhIp69lMeAJmb4t/d
> kT25XVkvuJlkqVfh3klZf+UwcV6sOnWaxYHsk+JA1K/dr3sAIFLAcju50AaRNgHa
> dchB1FvNMt373CBec5qk6qJ06qrKugq9KZsgnHxYR0YnyM6tVrcD1Mq/eHuVPlW9
> SXAlqtEnVBAXoVvNdAMyccrv7i9L/HcHwrsYfUsUmOy3X/PWj1IfNRY6cqyvt6C8
> p72KZTXeitg1pVKFd8PKVgmSPg1C2vO2uji7cpCqPY5JcwoVGOuEVNN4aoXkgvAT
> TsD5gm/uQCVI90/g/XGVeth6zGmShbXxsLHfZ4LCDdCEuc0NTOvB119tVw2kpSXT
> akmyi5Kl777BUz5x3WUoL4RlbeK6kpFaM7kAW7Uy3lzGnu2+IvwwJQqamhcqLQcv
> fngKTC2COHJo+6Wb19/Kpg6wlQG82NTBczlHlPyjeeyG3ZIVdrWs7UA/zX/E+vNc
> mziqVf91EVS9WzLE/nK+
> =2NJB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status