IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 08 August 2012 04:52 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7903D21F855E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Guz3tFZKN0xG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4734721F854F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75222C942B; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 04:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (173-11-96-181-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.11.96.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5838B216C33; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 04:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A60235AA9A; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:51:49 +1000 (EST)
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20120807074601.23F871A125@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <5021742A.70804@dougbarton.us>
Subject: Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:01:46 MST." <5021742A.70804@dougbarton.us>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:51:49 +1000
Message-Id: <20120808045149.41A60235AA9A@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:52:22 -0000

In message <5021742A.70804@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> On 08/07/2012 00:46, Martin Rex wrote:
> > IPv6 PA prefixes result in that awkward renumbering.
> > Avoiding the renumbering implies provider independent
> > network prefix.
> 
> ULA on the inside + https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6296

If you are changing your external connection you may as well just use
ULA + PA.  The DNS needs to be updated in either case, the firewall needs
to be updated in either case.
 
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email