Re: SHOULD vs MUST
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 25 June 2008 09:37 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7012828C0F6; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B399428C0F5 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dddirX0PUMdl for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ind-iport-2.cisco.com (ind-iport-2.cisco.com [64.104.129.219]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297613A65A6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,700,1204482600"; d="scan'208";a="9436805"
Received: from hkg-dkim-1.cisco.com ([10.75.231.161]) by ind-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2008 15:07:46 +0530
Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com (hkg-core-1.cisco.com [64.104.123.94]) by hkg-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5P9bkqI011137 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:37:46 +0800
Received: from xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-412.cisco.com [64.104.123.69]) by hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5P9bkXV011147 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:37:46 GMT
Received: from xfe-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com ([64.104.123.71]) by xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:37:45 +0800
Received: from [64.104.169.107] ([64.104.169.107]) by xfe-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:37:45 +0800
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <g3ror8$2b9$1@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: SHOULD vs MUST
References: <20080525020040.4DE5A5081A@romeo.rtfm.com><F66D7286825402429571678A16C2F5EE03ADF950@zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com><20080620195947.29D0B5081A@romeo.rtfm.com><9D9CF008-7350-4831-8F21-E08A0A7B255E@insensate.co.uk> <7706.1214216391.855029@peirce.dave.cridland.net> <g3ror8$2b9$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-Id: <900B2F8D-5960-4277-9DBC-E59A05F1CFBA@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:37:45 +0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2008 09:37:45.0609 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F7AE790:01C8D6A7]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=642; t=1214386666; x=1215250666; c=relaxed/simple; s=hkgdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20SHOULD=20vs=20MUST |Sender:=20; bh=haI0hYYk5aCdSv/XXJ/dZhkeVFgD1A9bxOgxm0Fqmio=; b=dLp6pJvjU+pgzPbYgBNiTQBgPQBg05P2V7ksxirvK21Bs0ewUroEPcJmdd AcrgY9oebrMdQxfvghw53YpDy7lInQcJcu/w6J6u9E5xVjblcNX76Zl4XRZT XL2OsTuJaTMvCOIqaXvRGzwjSfatlgGpu/As2DAW0iK0X8F7ca27A=;
Authentication-Results: hkg-dkim-1; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/hkgdkim1002 verified; );
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
On Jun 25, 2008, at 5:28 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote: >> A SHOULD X unless Y essentially means "SHOULD (X or Y)" > > I'd read it as "do X, but if you have a very good excuse > not doing X might do. One known very good excuse is Y." That is more or less my definition of "should". I say something "must" be so when I can tell you an operational failure that would or could happen if it isn't. If I would like to say "must" but can think of a case in which it would not be appropriate I say "should", and am saying that if it is not so in someone's implementation they should be prepared to say what their reason was. _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delive… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-lo… Richard Barnes
- RE: [Geopriv] [secdir] Review ofdraft-ietf-geopri… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Geopriv] Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-l… Eric Rescorla
- RE: [Geopriv] Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-l… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… Mary Barnes
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… TSG
- SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geop… Lawrence Conroy
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-… Eric Rescorla
- RE: [Geopriv] Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-l… Dawson, Martin
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-… Dave Cridland
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-… Joe Abley
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Frank Ellermann
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Fred Baker
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Scott Brim
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST John C Klensin
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Fred Baker
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Scott Brim
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST John C Klensin
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Scott Brim
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Dean Willis
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Robert Sparks
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Dave Crocker
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Dave Cridland
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST Iljitsch van Beijnum
- SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Dave Crocker
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Eric Gray
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Julian Reschke
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Keith Moore
- SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Dave Crocker
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST Eric Gray
- SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Dave Crocker
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity C. M. Heard
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Randy Presuhn
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Dave Crocker
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Dave Crocker
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Randy Presuhn
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Keith Moore
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Dave Crocker
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Eric Gray
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Spencer Dawkins
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Ralph Droms
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Dave Crocker
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity John Levine
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity John Leslie
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-de… Mary Barnes