Re: [Int-area] Existing use of IP protocol 114 (any 0-hop protocol)

Erik Kline <ek@loon.com> Thu, 19 September 2019 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB6A120836 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=loon.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGcy_HRA1KSk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com (mail-wr1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::444]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7933120841 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id r5so4584514wrm.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loon.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=l883H1Z5RTrBf2Cq3BwDttp8F5j8q67FMXXPSs6J/V0=; b=U0F0zPNBFfo1pRDxmUDaRdho/7FxQYhST7hV1syG620c0uGFHnEe804cmEJWM0ecNe CacKVFTqjM9jQDQRHuJueXWZ2AK4RLqYrfFbjASKVhC55jJWNGUve9EJePLYm3QdewFx T/+riXTSSuUwCx5hGRyM2gzas/09erLwazwVo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l883H1Z5RTrBf2Cq3BwDttp8F5j8q67FMXXPSs6J/V0=; b=OHmaN38kg8ErMGqNo2dhWT50QJ9VMhGVpMP/xE/wtmKeulhdG0w2N+Rco9Umblu5eV +ZAgLqi+K4JGYrCf05gLLej5iFU2ETeNZsINa3kyUxo/070DN4ylHFBmexsZKRu1beoq u//F/qxujU/l4RgDwcYhchxqRqn9I8pV3Az8S5fxIuDXU2aXCECZMKyqQLHtHnK5KEUR XRqlGETN2AUWCasDYTLEVBWn584ksMUcTP9PNWSA+g5q2M+Kh4GVL0Ie26d2DjazOuik YFchZeXtr6+ublSvIJWf5AxeP4E1ZUGKwUXbyTfUi1t03oEx8lbcOTk5fHQK5WKwI7RV 0+Bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU3SRTOoMUvIdCqFil8DiWkBZS5eNTj9yQYJdv/td+Tp2atKLze 0PuClojodTqFLDH5GKotO+MXQRq1mUQYfHSIg0oNU5qvOQfAsg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyOz19URV+4e8jKAtZV8uG7PWF3ryiAQU9sZ06VDIrNh9hzsBtFd9P2iGQHjnc+L0DcWMNaMe+6o4lKosvEvBc=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f7c3:: with SMTP id a3mr8830412wrq.141.1568928523874; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D6BD6D0F-9504-4533-BCFD-A79B2357BC96@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D6BD6D0F-9504-4533-BCFD-A79B2357BC96@cisco.com>
Reply-To: ek@loon.com
From: Erik Kline <ek@loon.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:28:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAedzxoRfjxzLXYZuOWAETjSdc0V00ULwdVGQOoePS7-UK8t_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Existing use of IP protocol 114 (any 0-hop protocol)
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000585ff50592eea3f7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SG2KX0h3lx2yssImLouXUeyRuCg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 21:28:57 -0000

Where do they want to use this, and why not request a new protocol value?

(What did iana@iana.org say?)

On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 08:07, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
wrote:

> The authors of https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhu-intarea-gma-03.txt
> would like to use IP protocol 114 as it is described as “Any 0-hop
> protocol” on the IANA page[1]. Alas, on the IANA page, there is no
> reference to this “Any 0-hop protocol”.
>
>
>
> Obviously, we all understand that this must be a protocol using hop limit
> = 0 (or TTL=0 for the legacy protocol).
>
>
>
> When there is no reference for a IANA number, this means that this number
> was assigned _*before*_ IANA, possibly by J. Postel and nobody at IANA
> and in the IESG know more. Hence, my questions to the community:
>
>
>
> Q1) does anyone know about a more formal reference / specification for
> this protocol 114
>
>
>
> Q2) does anyone know about a RFC or a protocol using this protocol 114 ?
>
>
>
> Please note that I do not ask for comments/reviews on the draft itself
> (they are welcome though on the int-area@ietf.org mailing list even if
> this is not a WG document). And it is also mostly obvious that only one
> transport layer can exist on the top of this protocol.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> -éric (INT AD)
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>