IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Thu, 26 March 2015 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7850F1ACED3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5XU0BDGRXHBK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE2B1ACECD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:18:28 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:18:28 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Thread-Topic: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Thread-Index: AQHQZ8I+s3awOIx/AUGixz7VXzbzDp0v7OwA
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:18:28 +0000
Message-ID: <D13A5077.57047%terry.manderson@icann.org>
References: <5513FE6B.7090405@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <5513FE6B.7090405@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3510260308_9490935"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SWjCVAj87Ls1mXbdvPWoI_trfTM>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:18:34 -0000

On 26/03/2015 10:41 pm, "Dave Crocker" <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

>Howdy,
>
>Michael noted that the two-year cycle for appointees means that those
>/not/ up for renewal go at least 18 months without feedback.  He put
>forward the need for feedback to them sooner than that, but asserted
>that having Nomcom do it would not be appropriate.
>
>As a natural consequence of its interviewing process, Nomcoms always get
>quite a bit of information about /all/ appointees, not just the ones
>currently up for renewal.  No one else acquires this kind of information
>regularly and reliably.
>
>Of the 4 nomcoms I've been on, at least two acted on this feedback,
>having a directed conversation with at least one such appointee each time.
>
>So I suggest that providing explicit feedback to all appointees not up
>for renewal become a regular part of nomcom's deliverables.

As a newly appointed AD, and not up for renewal soon, I would most
definitely appreciate feedback on how things are going. Be that directly
or otherwise. And as a huge fan of well implemented 306' reviews, for me
'sooner rather than later' is appreciated.

More than happy to be a guinea pig, regardless if it becomes and nomcom
process or not.

Cheers
Terry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email