IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Thu, 31 March 2016 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AFD12D81B; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qti.qualcomm.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bb8WPQ5_wYPf; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AABA12D80C; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1459456096; x=1490992096; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=hWK2VyYJE2KX0L+mdhPxjoP5V1Ihf2dQbeuxMICL32Y=; b=zLiZIj+ZDKr19r3WtcZfQP9HwuoW2UPaoVocT4t+LrBg6wjV+gYuR8SJ hYqgdraFnAytDyK3qQpd/1QXvWievlUFx4/DAVisCiPhrIWZpyg/nvK/J +W53JQwd/N0n5pc2kWnF5tUB39aiBjv9t6HhxGxdTt5fmK4cknSr2+Hx7 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,424,1455004800"; d="scan'208,217";a="181535366"
Received: from ironmsg04-r-new.qualcomm.com (HELO Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.108]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 31 Mar 2016 13:28:10 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5700,7163,8121"; a="1167059822"
Received: from nasanexm01f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.32]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 31 Mar 2016 13:28:10 -0700
Received: from [10.64.162.205] (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:28:09 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:28:08 -0500
Message-ID: <94D503BD-C0B7-45B1-A0C7-C615D5B527DC@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <56FB3298.9040209@gmail.com>
References: <56F6F0D6.9090300@gmail.com> <9928323F-BBDA-475B-B3E5-442676405C5B@qti.qualcomm.com> <56FB3298.9040209@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_E700394D-87CB-4742-A8A0-AA5D9B53A291_="
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5239)
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanexm01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.81) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SYUskM8wCzFGIbETbLntCGQsJNo>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-bradner-rfc3979bis.all@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:28:18 -0000

On 29 Mar 2016, at 20:57, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> I see your point, though. Would you buy something like this?
>
> "...see [RFC6701] for details of the sanctions defined in
> various existing Best Current Practice documents".

Sure, no objection to that if it makes you more comfortable.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email