Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrative Procedures
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 09 April 2008 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0233A6E01; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028873A6C27 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.468, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tG5B8zCxVEMF for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F3F3A6E01 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=p3.JCK.COM) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1JjeG6-000Naf-Ta; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:38:55 -0400
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:38:53 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrative Procedures
Message-ID: <BE553BCE544B8A70231137C9@p3.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <405E5ABA-C7C2-4A2A-8840-84A3860443AA@multicasttech.com>
References: <20080407194507.44B6028C21E@core3.amsl.com> <CAB795A3F7B5B1851E831FBB@beethoven.local> <0BDFFF51DC89434FA33F8B37FCE363D511F94E2B@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com> <E974AC59312981BA5F1A1364@p3.JCK.COM> <47FC2355.9030505@gmail.com> <33EDFDB1A6BB5C5B68362C2C@p3.JCK.COM> <405E5ABA-C7C2-4A2A-8840-84A3860443AA@multicasttech.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
--On Wednesday, 09 April, 2008 10:24 -0400 Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> wrote: > How, precisely, would the IAOC cease to exist ? Marshall, this is nearly irrelevant. The point is that there is language covering that case in the Trust Agreement and there is language in the procedures developed by the Trustees, and they are not consistent. > If they all resign or die, the IETF (IESG, IAB, ISOC) would > appoint more. > > If BCP 101 was changed, the new document would undoubtedly > cover the treatment of the Trust > by the IAOC replacement, or allow for direct appointments, or > whatever. At any rate, that should be worried about > then, not now. Then recommend to the community that the Trust Agreement be changed. If the ability to make this sort of change somehow got negotiated away... well, I guess we live with that, but it is still no reason to have a procedural document inconsistent with the Trust agreement. > > This wording is, in my opinion, purely to account for the case > of the IETF ceasing to exist, in which > case I think Brian's wording is appropriate. My imagination is paranoid enough to think of at least one more case, but I would suggest that the principle remains and that, were the IETF to abruptly go out of business, the former members of the former IAOC might not be the best people to act as receivers of the Trust and controllers of its remaining assets. Note that, with the way the new IPR documents are drawn, the Trust has some long-term responsibilities to the Internet community whether the IETF exists or not. > (And, of course, > if there is no IETF, there would presumably also be > no IESG, so they could not appoint more.) The Trust Agreement, IIR, says "IESG or its successor". Whether the various arrangements now in place are adequate to designate a successor to the IESG if they and IETF go out of business, I don't know. But I do know that isn't the problem of the Trust or IAOC (although either could make a proposal about what to do about it). > One of the parties of the Trust agreement was worried about > this. I am not. I'm not particularly worried about the conditions that would trigger any of these provisions occurring. I am worried about the IAOC and/or Trustees adopting procedures that are inconsistent with the Trust Agreement. Given what the Trust Agreement says, I don't believe the procedures actually need to say a word on this topic. Not saying a word would be, I believe, consistent with your "worried about then, not now" suggestion. But, if anything is going to be said, it needs to be consistent with the Trust Agreement _and_ reflect the desires and intent of the community. john _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrative P… Ray Pelletier
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Leslie Daigle
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Fred Baker
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Ray Pelletier
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Ray Pelletier
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Leslie Daigle
- RE: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Fred Baker
- RE: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- RE: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Ed Juskevicius
- RE: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Ray Pelletier
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Ted Hardie
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Stephan Wenger
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Fred Baker
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… Ray Pelletier
- Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrati… TS Glassey