Re: Enough DMARC whinging

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C4C1A08E3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RyaT-exB5CAA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BB21A802D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l4so1445373lbv.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IE9qQXF10+WO8TKESRk6BZIx9Pg7zlQL6gVjzUDz9Fs=; b=pehO2YczXs6KoU/EgVN8q/a+6nCqSpLHbcnVANxy5aKiET7++RSXDMVkKIGuCU+6eJ sR3sbgFC+M52v26SdZHullBZTGIPRudur7/D7WEfoByEQqqNKVk2XaJp2JZpBbg7faBg LpTiLlkHPla+XbbVBypyN7TFtq7xDKH+hvyqL2e9MqWIPKYa8D9kOyWNwtale2g0PH9P D2k65kH+BRXwp9lSwsxFwWPMSqQnUHppR2QjQ68ykpHezJzNsrOc61nn8T+cVovm8vDd j6R3Us6sqX520f+b/4bmBGxswXX+3ULunuOADer1uvqZ/PCXVrJELCz0DX10zCqIosqQ Z2zQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.87.176 with SMTP id az16mr2005390lab.43.1398876771435; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.234.229 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU3scwm=j2BJ6jq4k5zRQPkXOVOR1UscQqZZ8tG5HEZTwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwh0Sc2wtvjEAjOMi4emDzyF4JWmmzYr5QEFcmyoKtkTAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU0i1Ppc-nMeWL-ipms4E4b0wpsSRZdLG+2YhujPgH-ZPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwikJhO5R6UqWx8qUswMptgTw_wF6E6_9Ok=SRYTBChYgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU3scwm=j2BJ6jq4k5zRQPkXOVOR1UscQqZZ8tG5HEZTwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:52:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhtHRPmnoyXojHCtO10wCdQAGaCZPXztSrYZRLNiXQDmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Enough DMARC whinging
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SwoaNs883uVV1SofQLVtD3bbmxw
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:52:55 -0000

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Phillip,
>
>> Of course the way to make mailing lists work with DMARC would be to
>> look at the headers and treat messages with mailing list headers
>> differently. Perhaps the issue isn't in DMARC but how the information
>> from DMARC is applied.
>
>
> From my reading of sections 10.2, 5.2, and 15.4 of
> draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04, you can't do that and still claim receiver
> conformance with that draft (although there's the question of whether one
> should claim conformance to an informational draft in the first place).


Given a choice between conformance with a draft and conformance with
reality, I favor the second over the first.



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/