Re: Last Call: draft-xli-behave-ivi (The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition) to Experimental RFC

Hi,

I'm in favour of publishing this document.

I'm wondering which of the two relevant guidelines for Experimental
status in http://www.ietf.org/iesg/informational-vs-experimental.html
applies in this case.

Looking at the writeup in the tracker:
"This document presents a working example of the v4/v6 Stateless translation in
an operational network, which provides useful information for the interested
community."
I seem to see a much closer match to guidelines 2 or 3, which lead to
Informational.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 2009-12-05 03:43, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider 
> the following document:
> 
> - 'The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 
>    Coexistence and Transition '
>    <draft-xli-behave-ivi-05.txt> as an Experimental RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-01-01. Exceptionally, 
> comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xli-behave-ivi-05.txt
> 
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17439&rfc_flag=0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> 