Oauth blog post

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 29 July 2012 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921B521F8620 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 05:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2fQm71wLTbq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 05:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC28621F856D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 05:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by weyu54 with SMTP id u54so3388811wey.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 05:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hc1YcN9WyLLbA8BHJ+EjE6FESaT/qh6Owz5JmNMF4IE=; b=OqGeuogTZFnpm5wM5pkompZ/KaK1GODs1Pn+xCpsNZ/VMS0qZKozJJ1Xyzd598BUTy OKIG8y88tOroG6+YZgsAbWI+Ble0YHolHw4On6L65zfbouAfky597+JAEW0ggNji1iLq NHTeGuUzTsPngQEAGjlrNnfdk+3Pqf7RtjqyVwHPZEgOBeRQFpb3XWHRE06brZgI8BPs XTn2pZ13O/MsWI9mHpoV/PzGRGCtVeElybSs4JXHHo7FslJZQTmBvXe96nYlR6NQ+ijJ wWsjACy/V9umyOP4Mi0cUJDmDPlrRG7W62VFjtKPn5OPgOp/6ZRZZZEe7et/Si6sqots yLEA==
Received: by 10.180.98.69 with SMTP id eg5mr35258682wib.3.1343566328963; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.7.200] (93-173-131-118.bb.netvision.net.il. [93.173.131.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o2sm15283466wiz.11.2012.07.29.05.52.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <501531F7.5040404@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:52:07 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Oauth blog post
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:52:10 -0000

Hi,

this blog post ( 
http://hueniverse.com/2012/07/oauth-2-0-and-the-road-to-hell/) by the 
editor of OAuth 2.0 made the rounds of the geek news outlets: Slashdot, 
CNet etc. I am sure many people on this list have seen it. But I have 
seen no reactions on this list, nor on the SAAG list. Is this too 
unimportant to discuss? Is there nothing we, as an organization, can 
learn from it?

Thanks,
     Yaron