Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Mon, 16 September 2019 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD41D120100 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 19:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0bIWS4nLBHi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 19:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50B2D1200E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 19:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id y5so19245448pfo.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 19:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y1pr22NQXHpPuckglsUJ6Bj2TcN55+PtY7CG/ShoyOQ=; b=papqzGU29S6nJfzYJYILIkHKnJMxSOOpJ6qQOWlcWBDwRzlLwcYGwZiG58Hp1yFNtH o5YOQFwSQOgAGmN22dmCWTTx7p2xeRAysmsEOIyPTWw5CDbkakYRUVVhRumoNBnqWKYI YWnAT52ZhQKnaJxRsm3lmKmFKkxax/FDmgHV1B1azM8ncMPdRZOWYUhTG7K0R0hVsGpx KJK5sHr1hsX6Z4Lv76tde+VhZGnlqiCKn+DntrT7rz82lAVG1qil9HDnpK6oO/9nS+1G gWEUZc/Lv5I0PTYq3Hs+3MaqbZrrvM8VeRmZRMYnIC8tQPTltN1exHlItfx06H0pVS4m pedA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y1pr22NQXHpPuckglsUJ6Bj2TcN55+PtY7CG/ShoyOQ=; b=aXEFLC6RkzQgQiiCOfnSEhAmKNfU9ndXT50fsJSFtRDlynDqDUkIyE11V+/ImYA4iS f4m2Svlb0Cag3DiE0EfCFIl4n5sJhKv7gmJtjy7ERfDM/gRcpL7uumDdyRziky7KH5rf 38p8NlhajDWNHaaGklgURETZaSvqkMDH/gKfSpNZwNjRXfGzYfdlpWcCjEWHwaC5fLlL Ej2krRwvFh8/R96PxgHYmEuCxdlWiyEE4Ud6jr132TIbzsemylpd3p0379/vkqwqZu63 2S3SC0hvYXL6sZuoytvD71h3kB6B7UrvgZearzWwlO3Rr3iqMt2CVi/51nA2tsjBK2fH DHoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX2gtcctUU8twBFAjaLyTRgUgZvIXofdwIpYf/rZvV/EDZeM3dm ToB7L1+Llaq+C6Oz1lNsl6cAFPWh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRle+w2j7FHj0poQ39YahkkAFLeK1w0qD7sD2f5HT/WTxc2JHsV7HhqtPqrRdlRqo/rgpRdw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:7d8c:: with SMTP id y134mr8735033pfc.257.1568601910173; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 19:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aspen.local (63-140-65-24.dynamic.lte.acsalaska.net. [63.140.65.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dw19sm2403339pjb.27.2019.09.15.19.45.08 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Sep 2019 19:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJKvdoy9MtzHMwq-Ew-EJoUs0V8t+y01FL-E5r3xdyRemQ@mail.gmail.com> <EDBBBD9628A18755F4366D0B@PSB> <CALaySJ+cR0k=HpCvf5cSN4ony9zvzVeOZc=Qqot=cQN=jJF2fA@mail.gmail.com> <E032E905-E395-46CF-8C56-C3EBB8E20C9C@gmail.com> <CABcZeBO0NbEVQ67j8ZRgKXmjT3JeLFAgnSpfMA8CqAg1dp_j5w@mail.gmail.com> <073FAB7287FB558ECCED2CE0@PSB> <CABcZeBMegPn+hJuANAz9-iqon9n6R0Tsno8ECPe0MzEabDKf2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <05477d7a-6cfb-43ae-4984-3b491bfe3ef1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:45:07 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMegPn+hJuANAz9-iqon9n6R0Tsno8ECPe0MzEabDKf2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/T9abQtFyUasAZVoDuudugifchuE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 02:45:13 -0000

On 9/15/19 6:28 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:45 PM John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com
> <mailto:john-ietf@jck.com>> wrote:
>     However, we claim that the basis of what we do is "IETF
>     consensus".  Today, someone who opts out of the IETF list
>     essentially opts out of that consensus process no matter how
>     active they might be in, e.g., particular WGs.  

> I'm not sure on what basis you make that claim, but I don't agree. The
> discussion in the WG is part of the consensus proces.

Yes, but we do distinguish between working group consensus and IETF
consensus, and working group consensus is not sufficient to get a
document published.

Melinda

-- 
Melinda Shore
melinda.shore@gmail.com

Software longa, hardware brevis