Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Clint Chaplin <clint.chaplin@gmail.com> Sat, 28 January 2017 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <clint.chaplin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88982129B8D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 10:21:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aB9TR0zLxdcI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 10:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x234.google.com (mail-ua0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28AD9129871 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 10:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i68so225853306uad.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 10:21:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2lrfpcnOVLSsnqePc7llCdlwbtQvqXWWG9yIuChV2ko=; b=OAbl5LjTME9eUDN4Nav4IoECosjA6SaWAm++YDdqVPgUcyIAXxKFevvFrb9iezvcMY Gkeca0k8YLQ0Tt/uSDNMdlUCWS0FWSruuKXkkIFyzaVKSgcdAdDwt8IyP2LlZpuDR1Hc gj44FHQ0KOg9AWSwe5GbZAlELUpW9zqgEgWoXwVMGkDuWqj9TZ/QRyN8e0VlTtgM+qTQ 7mElnfEx3syFX4/3KMJ2Fxs0lnBeL3HDFkF6n8unbpH0J9/BrvsBR/9s4kDoux713I6X YFhEHihYO+iIbElc/HKdVjZ6my+nTP6bcLvIYknvvMRaGIOhgkwDEcfzcypUC1QSzlbF iKuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2lrfpcnOVLSsnqePc7llCdlwbtQvqXWWG9yIuChV2ko=; b=t/ynfjQk/jUSdcYq38Hf9V0OWlsqLWoE4iyF97JW4o8mN2jsIyQ2XoySCI+urRSndI RCcryVSamhWSQdLMPF+w9VO223JzN+/CytUvX8/E+v/ZfMcGlhwNGqn6Qye+B35DdUyw qYznsByOE++WHvSe3tKuhdFRum+079AyRFw+50H8Wp4HWuI1DXlDu3Ms7FP3JHcDD4/8 JvqMCk4FVtTeHsCPhBdV3afxvw7ZQHC0fKrtU/c7irge8nqqdLBTzrTKR5UUtweIOJ8s DfoAEzkwihnoliViI88wjzGFm14bteQbZe2FUrU/vzhmBOAEIXF271GsrtIrugk3JtQe N10A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK1hy+TDyZP8D5zwWOmWeqqEso+Wr5C7qQnfwjMZxyczvtYMEdcRPo5NONpS5p4Z/8Vm3cFV71PQR3LoQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.85.197 with SMTP id w5mr7509197uaa.36.1485627670244; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 10:21:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.4.161 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 10:21:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4ac8a2b9-a631-26c3-3126-9147152c381e@gmail.com>
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com> <20170127194324.GB38766@mx2.yitter.info> <4ac8a2b9-a631-26c3-3126-9147152c381e@gmail.com>
From: Clint Chaplin <clint.chaplin@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 10:21:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CADn-Gtg3HjRbTh3f=wE=EVg+0rtJeqRU=QjBoT_a4ArO=5Ddbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045e3f4a8db53805472ba53c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/T9www8FmAUG0LTs7Q_EkgbrM5EY>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:21:12 -0000

The other thing to think about is the issue of people from the US
travelling to non-US venues and then being refused re-entry into the US.
Works both ways....

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 1/27/17 10:43 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > I note that there is a WG, MTGVENUE, that is working on criteria for
> > meeting venues.  It seems to me that discussing the overall question
> > of specific exclusions at a venue for individuals on the basis of some
> > set of class properties (whether it be nationality, religion, choices
> > in emotional relationships, or whatever) would be appropriate in that
> > WG.  Moreover, since the WG hasn't finished its work perhaps the WG
> > list would be better to explore the issue than the IETF list.
>
> Indeed, and the question of whether what's currently in the draft
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-
> venue-selection-process/?include_text=1)
> on that question is sufficient is currently under discussion.  Note
> that the goal is to provide guidance from the IETF to the IAOC on
> questions like this.
>
> Melinda
>
>
>


-- 
Clint Chaplin
Principal Standards Engineer
Samsung Research America