Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A08A130E39 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id azxiipOQb44H for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E88C130E2A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id u12-v6so5443234ioc.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JNyGbtq7ljBFX1dr17QC9nwFJwbbLFbw0TCO2tJFGMg=; b=eNQHx8jvsyXZeQVtVm7DGogkQC9T5ObqV5d9nidLvopVTGcxpl53NfkvT4JZc9w1iw s9EIAw99vshM8ijSSnXKRnt3Cg0aQtfF083kAUzl4Rnhe8hVpmfBB/Tkw+ec9kMT1qLz 6OfS8W+rDU8AQunWfptRiWmiCGDcW2uenUKMRnpbl2SHIeoNyUPgnV1DXf9aFS1xnZLG 5vyR6rNwF224iBmqWscx1XiPJgPFLLZaslh0mIN/eRg25GAYFwQCaX6SpoS8miu0NH3F vMhRwMGNJDeURJJxbX+oxz5mNIJOr9BhXCeXZ8uxcR4JUNscxJjSG2rMeT6MsksmySWC zxQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JNyGbtq7ljBFX1dr17QC9nwFJwbbLFbw0TCO2tJFGMg=; b=bOEQtQkdHuVv3OKoJnHISlJIxH8jIcRDU41QjM8OYRGXNAvVAXALgVcxCw9RVW6guK 1BegWAOZlUh8nDGRbevY92xamZFVNPeMWR8zLYRu43JrKfTc8Fqe8dVee6Nwb0OA+aFN 8TKiy9g+VfMK0bBBa6iQGPlZFDOGiZ8GwK2Jd+CHxsubhzxF1jEQSrolN9EFnLqLxP6Z puYD+9QaPI7lZFg1H8UkY5rtKA+bpR1F821AnX9xPd4PprtKwVFCNKwbOqLQVB8WpRgS B2bwSxDASnJuVYdcy1dEiwo08vUY7io9bM0GrW1ECRyyBtctNsIzGI0ylC55E3ToWRDG 6DCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DWD0CNIr96p1Ht1fauOg7/C5bINcBS+2R76iTH9h8PhDPQtHtZ kA6ISglw5a/JaiMf7jJsgTCv71PbsC8cj+YnDfP7wQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZ9Hqvgdl3cwbLcZwm9lfdhgs9thcJlMsMQzXqKXEnltDc/D/fVM/559xGJc+Ulzi8rUbRC2pDjTud6hw4tYds=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:1e94:: with SMTP id 20-v6mr5901056jat.34.1537490141655; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180920132601.uwv2lblcvr4ojtk5@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAHbuEH7jeGLBMH8Yi+_o+o-NvZKmWt4KbtwbP-8XtL0taUCx_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20180920143103.lvg6rmkzqfyjq3fr@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <52399791-9285-bcab-4fcd-3eb0f0a1f64f@gmail.com> <20180920151907.5wxxlccrvcgzjzcz@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <0FE3D4B6-CDDC-40A5-AC84-9C9E24278919@vpnc.org> <20180920171706.vemkprtgq2potrkr@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20180920185721.GD68853@isc.org> <20180920201136.dtdw3dcjw663byu4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B40D702B-CD2D-42F0-91D5-D7B2776C2A2F@fugue.com> <20180920234451.l3kirvilfpb5pvsh@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20180920234451.l3kirvilfpb5pvsh@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:35:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=j_FC-PdPKt-QUSStxhpaCEaALhdjS-UjDCh8KUn6Zmg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: each@isc.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd4d5a057656d191"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TIdZHJUZH_oopS_42w1YEWdh0Do>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:35:46 -0000

My point is that the reference you were making was not an IETF document,
and as far as I know nobody has complained about it.   This discussion was
triggered by actual complaints by actual people, and the terms about which
the complaints were made are used in IETF standards; this is why it's a
matter of interest.

I'm not suggesting that the discussion be limited to those who've been
personally affected; in that case I certainly would have no standing to
comment.   What I'm saying is that this really is a serious discussion that
affects real people in meaningful ways, and you seemed to be trivializing
it.   I'm sorry if I misunderstood.

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:44 PM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:

>
> Ted,
>
> Your attempt at trying to characterize problematic words with
> "hurtfull" is useful. Asking for the discussion to be limited
> to people personally affected is not so useful. And trust me,
> its not fun to question the effectiveness and efficiency of
> well meaning initiatives.
>
> I brought up "fat" as a well known example of abuse in hostile
> work environments that i assume most on this thread could
> easier relate to than slavery (fat shaming). Makes it IMHO
> easier to imagine how language management can not really
> help directly with hostile work environments.
>
> I really don't think that pythons change can help with any
> hostile work environments either. The best benefit i can think of
> is relief for the poor teacher in school/college of an affected
> country who really does not need a discussion about slavery when
> teaching a 101 computer course in python. Nor the support for
> playfull passive-aggressive behavior when students start
> programming with a a derogatory-rich vocabulary.
>
> Cheers
>     Toerless
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:39:58PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> > On Sep 20, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > > Do i qualify to demand a rename of
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_tree <
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_tree>
> > > if i have an appropriate BMI and feel offended or do i have to work in
> > > a Data Center ?
> >
> > Toerless, let me put it to you this way: are you having a problem at
> work that is sufficient that you feel that you would like to report it to
> your human resources/personnel department as harassment, but you don't feel
> safe in doing so?   If so, and if what you are experiencing is being
> enabled by some terminology used in the IETF, then what you are saying
> would apply.   Otherwise you are just wasting our time asking this
> question.   This is not a Kaffee Klatsch, and we are not talking about this
> for fun.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_work_environment <
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_work_environment>
> >
>
> --
> ---
> tte@cs.fau.de
>