IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Fri, 01 January 2016 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B41D1A1A24 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 00:04:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.261
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MVdxY1IGc8XU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 00:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EED11A1A19 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 00:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.118] (frobbit.cust.teleservice.net [85.30.128.225]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9F3321472; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:04:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Subject: Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 09:04:10 +0100
Message-ID: <1C7E4F9C-C1D4-4383-98D8-65D48CC7BEE8@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <56856B35.9090202@bogus.com>
References: <7664F94E-F7A6-4556-B1E6-2DE536A7B7FC@frobbit.se> <56856B35.9090202@bogus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_1A281DCB-ACDD-4D63-9DB5-929547360119_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5187)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TLIwdQyQDqxGpsLpIKr_NqXAWyc>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 08:04:14 -0000

On 31 Dec 2015, at 18:51, joel jaeggli wrote:

> While we might choose to restrict our definition of edge filtering to
> the single-homed customers of retail ISPs, there are rather a lot of
> those. There is on the other hand a plurality of transit ISPs that
> cannot implement BCP 38 as envisioned or even something close to it.

Completely agree, so why not start with the single home customers. What about look at default configuration of CPEs and alike? What about...I just do not know. Something just must be done.

   Patrik

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status