Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Tue, 10 February 2015 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25071A011D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:01:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YtRX3LTpZlLd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [216.240.21.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2AC11A00DC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,549,1418112000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="22346197"
Received: from hioexcmbx08-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.41]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2015 00:56:44 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.34) by hioexcmbx08-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:56:43 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.34]) by hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.34]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.031; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:56:42 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
Thread-Topic: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
Thread-Index: AQHQRJqxvuXnAE0ImkSPNfddJniHk5zpRhwAgAAsNACAAKmPgA==
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:56:42 +0000
Message-ID: <44CB4513-ABB6-438F-B9EB-5E76CA14C86D@netapp.com>
References: <54D903C0.6050209@gmail.com> <54D91478.4060303@nostrum.com> <54D9398C.8000805@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <54D9398C.8000805@qti.qualcomm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.37]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4B117775-2591-4F76-81C9-754544FC5E7C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TLOgtoUyxWH1Pz0MQoO5JZ9QFBI>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:01:46 -0000

Hi,


On 2015-2-9, at 23:49, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>; wrote:
> 
> The IESG, in part at the behest of the community, wanted to (by default) make sure that IESG ballots were copied to the WG mailing list instead of being a private conversation between the authors, the chairs, and the IESG, invisible to anyone else in the community.

and that's a fine motivation.

The implementation of this is the issue:

> Now, the mechanism used to accomplish that (adding the WG to the .notify alias, which in turn adds it to the .all alias) sends *all* notifications regarding a document to the WG by default. Perhaps we want to change that.

I think we want to explicitly CC the list, so that mail filtering keeps working.

Lars