Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailing Lists
Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Tue, 15 April 2008 05:28 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33CD3A6AC1; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E6F3A68CE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.255, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_STATIC=1.172]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98lJaNfYnphR for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (dsl-66-59-230-40.static.linkline.com [66.59.230.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ECF3A6AC1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01MTMPTNHJTC003EBL@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01MTMOP4P2J4000078@mauve.mrochek.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01MTMPTLYPQ6000078@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:20:57 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailing Lists
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:49:57 -0600" <001701c89ea3$64a74200$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
References: <20080414153938.0A5153A6D4D@core3.amsl.com> <4803BDB1.4030005@levkowetz.com> <4803C5D7.7020900@gmail.com> <01MTM8WCXSZK00007A@mauve.mrochek.com> <4803DA2D.9090602@levkowetz.com> <01MTMBYCI1TI00007A@mauve.mrochek.com> <4803E977.8080302@levkowetz.com> <01MTMLEABAII001WS1@mauve.mrochek.com> <001701c89ea3$64a74200$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
> Hi - > > From: "Ned Freed" <ned.freed@mrochek.com> > > To: "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com> > > Cc: "Ned Freed" <ned.freed@mrochek.com>; <ietf@ietf.org> > > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:12 PM > > Subject: Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailing Lists > ... > > And there's that word "automatically". There is nothing in the text that says > > such arrangements have to be automatic. > ... > I have the same problem with the text. It says: > > * IETF mailing lists MUST provide a mechanism for legitimate technical > > participants to bypass moderation, challenge-response, or other techniques > > that would interfere with a prompt technical debate on the mailing list > > without requiring such participants to receive list traffic. > The stated requirement is that it must not "interfere with a prompt > technical debate". Clearly, that rules out anything requiring human > intervention. It does nothing of the sort. This is talking about the effect the whitelist must have, not the procedure for setting it up. And before you argue that it can be read as applying to the setup procedure, then you need to explain what it means to "bypass moderation" for a whitelisting setup operation. That makes no sense whatsoever. > What do you have in mind that would allow the > spammer^H^H^H^H^H^H^H participant to post without subscribing > and without interacting with a chair or list administrator? I have no such thing in mind because there's no such requirement to meet. However, this has gone on long enough. I give up - what seems completely and absolutely clear to me to the point of patent obviousness is apparently totally opaque to lots of other people. So let's change the language to make it clear to everyone and be done with it. Ned _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailing Li… IESG Secretary
- RE: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Daniel Brown
- RE: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Russ Housley
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Eliot Lear
- Re: [dkim unverified] Re: IESG Statement on Spam … Michael Thomas
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Frank Ellermann
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Henrik Levkowetz
- RE: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Ned Freed
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Dave Crocker
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Ned Freed
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Ned Freed
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Randy Presuhn
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Ned Freed
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… John Levine
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Ned Freed
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Tim Chown
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Tom.Petch
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Tom.Petch
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… James Galvin
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… TS Glassey
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… James Galvin
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… James Galvin
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… James Galvin
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Frank Ellermann
- RE: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Cullen Jennings
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… James Galvin
- Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailin… Frank Ellermann