IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: United Nations report on Internet standards

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 16 March 2020 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21ACC3A0E67 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yoi9MUEbu1Ml for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D29B3A0E5E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s13so19735626ljm.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cLfMN5OH/lYihd/QqSrlpnKNbX/gMbxCoMCK5DXCfKc=; b=ZthxLbutX37km41iErY3OcV9I2w22WuR2XbTosEohaIDqvys+V+Fvi0awB9RoA3Pwc hAGPDUn10GS/KY6JI0TbAE58J0VeOsswi0oKhE3iI1MuufUCQmJcgNsywbEBrTOYPIh0 HNrK63Wh+xyGHIKDU4147kqsPeRqWxYPHsh+9gsd/0TdJSFldo+j+gN3u6hIGiwdKy9t 5gQAu6ap4HSvw8G2xzM1QpfDiJd/cJ+BL+W6atAuZd5fa6LEnBRgBQvVECdpmpQRY4A4 7RwqP/OfFeRov2sL9+XyGAvtFg73vmr4kqfPPYYz8IgEEoTjQqAKKCGQvQ3EaY5/rAwd 1F+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cLfMN5OH/lYihd/QqSrlpnKNbX/gMbxCoMCK5DXCfKc=; b=L8ggBFFDY5ArthfqIPO6Iewr/k/foKlc/fv/B8jV1oFzxdVIucsifOu+qwtlx0YlJY 1t6u7QUDgr1sh9CdUQ+7lyYAzhXXK2JKY7JZjZk0Xn5awp9gkl+udGkJlsKftQiP3FQ9 22Taaolq+3GdRkOt/YVBCO5y2ThYPZqqXQjVMpiObvxfSQ7F7TGlIO6ABy2pMYt280Ma 0SoOlyLxpmpXmE+yNelHb+uZiSXoscA5xjAsUcjLqDnq6oGXPlC7Es2uPJWjovu/GU6q dTLsTuUBDkZ0sAWFNCjJ3ji8h02VpjUA5xth8mtewHhZQQtyZR25l5D9km5lvn4Ctzll 3NxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ01JEgJGEfIUWeBGvNyS9GqnkmyajzCBhFyvp7fLd8mOZHHI0he SRSRJL2nFvsVYoRaeiVMANi66/TwX0k4F2fC0i1L5jnMcKRLG6e8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vusnZb4TPmwHEt2qP8e3Nw/nejOFyLtsXy1bETPEpaZ9OlC2atRsX3Y5omRitibceCiDfkuscH1vrpdyGuf9XE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b88d:: with SMTP id r13mr295914ljp.66.1584381511078; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <255650568.54634.1584372553034@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <DE96433F-AB80-4522-A6EB-44EE44A54950@cisco.com> <CAJU8_nWPdV71NJh3ZrK0dBEDg4zaYZoKFGDQtY=Hv3UjAvfugA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nWPdV71NJh3ZrK0dBEDg4zaYZoKFGDQtY=Hv3UjAvfugA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 13:57:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJa899JtOwRWg1h8_W+th5rA+obE6Gius=NpNWpgzi_6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: United Nations report on Internet standards
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TNUCweAysYoxRLmGymDTMsFTp6A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:58:39 -0000

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:54 AM Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> wrote:
>
> Yup. They know where to find us. Our standards development process is very open.
>
> I imagine there are few participants who would be in favor of privileged access or powers given to governments: I certainly would be vehemently opposed to any such change in our processes.


I would also be opposed to any such change, but for completeness,
ICANN has the GAC - Governmental Advisory Committee.
While the GAC is an advisory committee[0], it holds special privilege
- see the bylaws for details:
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article12

W
[0]: like the Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC), Security
and Stability Advisory Committee[1] (SSAC), At-Large Advisory
Committee (ALAC)
[1]: Full disclosure: on which I serve.

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 9:35 AM Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16 Mar 2020, at 16:29, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf..org> wrote:
>>
>> It formulates (section 8.1) six recommendations, of which the sixth is specifically aimed at the IETF and other Internet standards organizations:
>>
>> "Standardisation processes are advised to include a consultation phase with government and industry policy makers, and civil society experts.”
>>
>>
>>
>> Individuals from governments, industry policy makers, and civil society experts are welcome to participate in all IETF community activities, at draft conception, working group formation or assignment, working group adoption, working group development, IETF last call, and then errata/updates to that work.  All that is required is an email account.
>>
>> Eliot
>>
>>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email