RE: Nits and XML2RFC

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 05 September 2017 10:07 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9C4132811 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 03:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvkbp5SXtSHA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 03:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5729B13219C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 03:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v85A6lDD013878; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:06:47 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (196.252.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.252.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v85A6iwA013847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:06:46 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Christian Huitema'" <huitema@huitema.net>, <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <4dd2cc3c-c30e-b8ae-8bd2-02025885d3da@huitema.net> <12dcd171-b4a7-50a4-8fbd-366db6a61d9b@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <12dcd171-b4a7-50a4-8fbd-366db6a61d9b@huitema.net>
Subject: RE: Nits and XML2RFC
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:06:42 +0100
Message-ID: <061901d3262e$ade196b0$09a4c410$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGeffOxkDwZYCwzpwVhPVAFvXDsYQG1alB9owG0dJA=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.1.0.1062-23304.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--17.134-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--17.134-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: y/2oPz6gbviPnoiNOctH6eEbUg4xvs+wa/fioJ9l4Hh6GeWCu+JlEMLm p4jPUF8t545k976poTk7QlE0DAcVy2QkgVelQi41mlaAItiONP398SfleimUWio1qDe65b7iSPw C1WkNyaA9I11kCciPgYWN/O/p5Ztvd+RVLXchoNxPuMJi/ZAk8UyQ5fRSh265dEG7y+D7o5Chqe T3Vbva/eyXzLxaAGeGr9FmUSjFlo4JXTHNx4/P6Mu00lnG8+PWXEjKf9fhKac0vmEx15gL5/62c y+dCX5TNoRRbW4nkEZrRiMQvSLFT+VHGbcDbAq6gxsfzkNRlfJoFT3KzpHqEzOrHoO19Vm2jocz muoPCq2UTGVAhB5EbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TYemvgT1mpTphMkgiPSqhVNzH_M>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:07:05 -0000

Christian,

The "bug" is that xml2rfc now inserts "https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/" and "https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info" whereas idnits checks for "http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/" and "http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info"

Cheers,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Huitema
> Sent: 04 September 2017 20:53
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Nits and XML2RFC
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/4/2017 12:42 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > I just formatted a draft using xml2rfc and the online tool,
> > https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/. Then I submitted the result for
> > publication. And it was refused because the submission checking tool
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/ found 4 errors in the copyright and
> > IPR boilerplate. This is weird, because my draft used the xml2rfc option
> > ipr="trust200902". But it seems that the xml2rfc tool and the submission
> > checking tool disagree. I get an interesting message, complaining about
> > errors such as this one: ....
> > As far as I can tell, the only difference between one text and the other
> > are the position of the line breaks. Of course, the line breaks are
> > chosen by the editing tool, and I have no control.
> >
> > Any suggestion on how to fix my draft?
> >
> OK, I managed to fix the submission. My mistake was to submit both a
> text document and an XML document. Since the xml2rfc editor used by the
> submission tool produces a slightly different format than the xml2rfc
> online tool, this generated nits. Probably the results of some recent
> change. Anyhow, I fixed the submission by submitting only the XML
> document. That appeared to be working.
> 
> --
> Christian Huitema