IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminally prosecutable in nature...

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 04 June 2008 04:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD623A6C22; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448983A6C1E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id byp-3K0xeX93 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3062F3A6BDB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300532596B9; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:31:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21455-08; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:31:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.165] (162.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.162]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025102596B8; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:31:22 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:31:22 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: TS Glassey <tglassey@certichron.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminally prosecutable in nature...
Message-ID: <22E9CA8CCA5372C964934736@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <000b01c8c4d4$b94273f0$0200a8c0@tsg1>
References: <000b01c8c4d4$b94273f0$0200a8c0@tsg1>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


--On Monday, June 02, 2008 10:17:16 -0700 TS Glassey 
<tglassey@earthlink.net> wrote:

> I brought this up a number of times and Harald's solution was to ban me
> from the list. Something that under the US CFAA is prosecutable... His
> claim was that I failed to show him the money - that special case which
> establishes that as a standard.

I believe I told you to show competent legal advice saying that what you 
were posting was relevant to the IETF.

I have read your provided material, and fail to see any sign of such 
competent legal advice; no name but your own is attached to the claim of 
relevance.

(for those who wonder what case it is, it is 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan_Meier>.)

                        Harald

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email